Comparison of Root Canal vs. Dental Implant: Outcome and Success Rates
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.96Keywords:
Tooth decay, dental implants, root canal, dental pulp, oral health, dental surgery, endodontistAbstract
Tooth decay (cavity) has the potential to affect all parts of the tooth, which include: enamel, dentin, and the pulp (nerve of the tooth). Tooth decay is caused by poor hygiene which leads to different sugars accumulating in the mouth, producing bacteria. As the cavity grows in size and when the cavity has reached the pulp, more extensive treatment may be needed. Because dental cavities is the most common non-communicable disease worldwide, knowing the effectiveness of several treatments is very important to maintain good oral-health. In adult patients with detrimental cavities or infections, a root canal or implant are two possible treatments that follow the standard of care. A systematic review will be conducted to evaluate whether root canal treatment or implant placement has a higher success and better outcome. Information will be gathered from multiple research articles to draw a conclusion. A root canal option requires the patient to maintain a much stringent oral hygiene routine and follow up with maintenance visits at the dental office. However, an implant is a surgical procedure that may take time to osseointegrate and thus requires more patience and follow up visits from the patient. Although a root canal or an implant are two ways of successfully treating a cavity or infection, our research shows a root canal has a higher success rate and thus should be explored more carefully as a viable treatment option by a patient.
References
“Dental Caries (Tooth Decay) in Adults (Age 20 to 64).” National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, www.nidcr.nih.gov/research/data- statistics/dental-caries/adults. Accessed 1 Sept. 2022.
Aas, Jørn A., et al. “Bacteria of Dental Caries in Primary and Permanent Teeth in Children and Young Adults.” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 46, no. 4, 2008, pp. 1407–17. Crossref, https:// doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01410-07.
Krall, E. A., et al. “Cigarette Smoking Increases the Risk of Root Canal Treatment.” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 85, no. 4, 2006, pp. 313–17. Crossref, https://doi.org/ 10.1177/154405910608500406.
Alley, Bradley S., et al. “A Comparison of Survival of Teeth Following Endodontic Treatment Performed by General Dentists or by Specialists.” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, vol. 98, no. 1, 2004, pp. 115–18. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.tripleo.2004.01.004.
GORNI, F., and M. GAGLIANI. “The Outcome of Endodontic Retreatment: A 2-Yr Follow-Up.” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 30, no. 1, 2004, pp. 1–4. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200401000-00001.
Moskovitz, Moti, et al. “Success Rate of Root Canal Treatment in Primary Molars.” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 33, no. 1, 2005, pp. 41–47. Crossref, https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.07.009.
Morris, Michael F., et al. “Comparison of Nonsurgical Root Canal Treatment and Single-Tooth Implants.” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 35, no. 10, 2009, pp.1325–30. Crossref, https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.joen.2009.07.003.
Galindo-Moreno, Pablo, et al. “Influence of Alcohol and Tobacco Habits on Peri- implant Marginal Bone Loss: A Prospective Study.” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 16, no. 5, Wiley, Sept.2005, pp. 579–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1600-0501.2005.01148.x.
Giro, Gabriela. “Impact of Osteoporosis in Dental Implants: A Systematic Review.” World Journal of Orthopedics, vol. 6, no. 2, 2015, p. 311. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v6.i2.311.
Hong, Do Gia Khang, and Ji-hyeon Oh. “Recent Advances in Dental Implants.” Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 39, no. 1, 2017. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-017-0132-2.
T., Albrektsson, and Johansson C. “Osteoinduction, Osteoconduction and Osseointegration.” European Spine Journal, vol. 10, no. 0, 2001, pp. S96–101. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1007/ s005860100282.
Chen, Jie, et al. “Immediate versus Early or Conventional Loading Dental Implants with Fixed Prostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials.” The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 122, no. 6, 2019, pp. 516–36. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.prosdent.2019.05.013.
Wang, Min-Ching, et al. “A Qualitative Study of Patients’ Views of Techniques to Reduce Dental Anxiety.” Journal of Dentistry, vol. 66, 2017, pp. 45–51. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jdent.2017.08.012.
AlQutub, Alaa W. “Pain Experience after Dental Implant Placement Compared to Tooth Extraction.” International Journal of Dentistry, edited by Vincenzo Iorio Siciliano, vol. 2021, 2021, pp. 1–5. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4134932.
H. Gonza ́lez-Santana, M. Peñarrocha- Diago, J. Guarinos- Carbo ́, and J. Balaguer-Mart ́ınez, “Pain and inflammation in 41 patients following the placement of 131 dental implants,” Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral Cirugia Bucal, vol. 10, pp. 258–263, 2005.
Alonso-Ezpeleta, LO., et al. “Postoperative Pain after One-Visit Root- Canal Treatment on Teeth with Vital Pulps: Comparison of Three Different Obturation Techniques.” Medicina Oral Patología Oral y Cirugia Bucal, 2012, pp. e721–27. Crossref, https://doi.org/ 10.4317/medoral.17898.
AlRahabi, Mothanna K. “Predictors, Prevention, and Management of Postoperative Pain Associated with Nonsurgical Root Canal Treatment: A Systematic Review.” Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, vol. 12, no. 5, 2017, pp. 376–84. Crossref, https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2017.03.004.
Gotler, M., et al. “Postoperative Pain after Root Canal Treatment: A Prospective Cohort Study.” International Journal of Dentistry, vol. 2012, 2012, pp. 1–5. Crossref, https://doi.org/ 10.1155/2012/310467.
Woodmansey KF, Ayik M, Buschang PH, White CA, He J. Differences in masticatory function in patients with endodontically treate¹⁰d teeth and single- implant-supported prostheses: a pilot study. J Endod 2009;35:10–4.
Ng, Y. L., et al. “Outcome of Primary Root Canal Treatment: Systematic Review of the Literature – Part 1. Effects of Study Characteristics on Probability of Success.” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 40, no. 12, 2007, pp. 921–
Crossref, https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1365-2591.2007.01322.x.
Moraschini, V., et al. “Evaluation of Survival and Success Rates of Dental Implants Reported in Longitudinal Studies with a Follow-up Period of at Least 10 Years: A Systematic Review.” International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 44, no. 3,2015, pp. 377–88. Crossref, https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2014.10.023.
Compton, Sharon, et al. “Dental Implants in the Elderly Population: A Long-Term Follow-Up.” The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 32, no. 1, 2017, pp. 164–70. Crossref, https:// doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5305.
Downloads
Posted
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Vincent Nguyen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.