Effects of Angle of Attack on the Aerodynamic Performance of NACA 2412 Airfoil: Computational Fluid Dynamics Comparison of k-ε, k-ω, and k-ω SST Turbulence Models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.4129Keywords:
NACA 2412 Airfoil, Computational Fluid Dynamics, Angle of Attack, Turbulence Modeling, k-ε turbulence model, k-ω turbulence model, k-ω SST turbulence model, Aerodynamic Performance, Lift Coefficient, Drag Coefficient, AerodynamicsAbstract
The predictions of airfoil performance using computational fluid dynamics can be sensitive to the choice of turbulence model. The present study examined the effects of turbulence-model selection and angle of attack on the aerodynamic performance of a NACA 2412 airfoil. Eighteen simulations were run in SimScale with k-ε, k-ω and k-ω shear stress transport (SST) models at angles of attack from 0 to 10 degrees with 2 degree increments. All simulations were performed at a freestream velocity of 80 m/s and a Reynolds number of approximately 3.1E6. The models were validated in terms of lift coefficient, drag coefficient, lift to drag ratio, pressure and velocity contours and maximum y+ values. The most stable and accurate results were obtained using the k-ω SST model. The lift coefficient increased from 0.282 at 0° to 0.574 at 10°. This model underpredicted experimental lift values, but it produced the expected trend and predicted the highest aerodynamic efficiency among the models tested. The k-ω model also gave a generally consistent lift trend but predicted higher drag and lower aerodynamic efficiency. Conversely, the k-ε model was giving irregular and non-physical values at several angles of attack. These results demonstrate the importance of the turbulence model selection on the predicted airfoil performance and suggest that the k-ω SST was the most appropriate model for the conditions studied.
References
Abbott, I. H., & Von Doenhoff, A. E. (1959). Theory of wing sections: Including a summary of airfoil data. Dover Publications.
Akgümüş Gök, D., & Alnimer, K. (2024). Characterization of NACA 2412 and NACA 4412 airfoils: Effects of angle of attack on aerodynamic coefficients. Journal of Thermal Engineering, 10(6), 1524–1538. https://jten.yildiz.edu.tr/storage/upload/pdfs/1731578878-en.pdf
Bourisli, R. I., & Hamadeh, F. Z. S. (2020). Optimizing NACA airfoil thickness function parameters for maximum lift-to-drag ratio. In AIAA SciTech 2020 Forum. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2020-1297
Launder, B. E., & Spalding, D. B. (1974). The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 3(2), 269–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(74)90029-2
Menter, F. R. (1994). Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal, 32(8), 1598–1605. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149
Prabhakar, A., & Ohri, A. (2013). CFD Analysis on MAV NACA 2412 Wing in High Lift Take-Off Configuration for Enhanced Lift Generation. Journal of Aeronautics & Aerospace Engineering, 2(5), 125. DOI: 10.4172/2168-9792.1000125.
Seetharam, H. C., Rodgers, E. J., & Wentz, W. H., Jr. (1977). Experimental studies of flow separation of the NACA 2412 airfoil at low speeds (NASA Contractor Report NASA-CR-19950002355). Wichita State University, Aeronautical Engineering Department.
Versteeg, H. K., & Malalasekera, W. (2007). An introduction to computational fluid dynamics: The finite volume method (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
Wilcox, D. C. (2006). Turbulence modeling for CFD (3rd ed.). DCW Industries.
Downloads
Posted
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Research Archive of Rising Scholars

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.