Preprint / Version 1

Unveiling the Depths: A Comprehensive Comparison of Monocular Depth Models and LiDAR-Camera 3D Perception

##article.authors##

  • Yousif Abdelgawad Dakahlia STEM High School

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.2821

Keywords:

Deep Learning, LiDAR Camera, Monocular Depth Model, Comparison, 3D perception

Abstract

In the evolving landscape of autonomous driving and advanced robotics, 3D perception stands as a cornerstone for safe and efficient operation. This domain fundamentally relies on the system's ability to accurately understand its surroundings in three dimensions, enabling tasks such as precise object detection, comprehensive scene understanding, and reliable navigation. This analysis delves into two primary methodologies for achieving 3D perception: monocular depth estimation (MDE) and LiDAR-camera fusion (LCF). While both aim to construct a detailed 3D representation of the environment, they employ distinct sensor modalities and processing paradigms, leading to significant differences in their performance, cost implications, computational demands, and adaptability to various environmental conditions. The comparative evaluation of these approaches heavily relies on established benchmark datasets such as KITTI and nuScenes. These datasets provide a standardized framework for assessing performance using metrics like Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) for depth accuracy, Intersection over Union (IoU) for object detection quality, and inference time for evaluating computational efficiency. Through this rigorous analysis, a clearer understanding of each method's strengths, limitations, and optimal application scenarios emerges, guiding practical recommendations for system design and identifying promising avenues for future research in hybrid perception models.

References

Caesar, H., Bankiti, V., Lang, A. H., Vora, S., Liong, V. E., Xu, Q., ... & Urtasun, R. (2020).

nuScenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous driving. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

https://www.nuscenes.org

Sun, P., Kretzschmar, H., D’Arcy, M., Patnaik, V., Tsui, P., Guo, J., ... & Ngiam, J. (2020).

Scalability in perception for autonomous driving: Waymo open dataset. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

https://waymo.com/open

Geiger, A., Lenz, P., & Urtasun, R. (2013).

Are we ready for autonomous driving? The KITTI vision benchmark suite. International Journal of Computer Vision, 87(1–2), 1–26.

http://www.cvlibs.net/datasets/kitti

Huang, X., Cheng, X., Geng, Q., Cao, B., Zhou, D., Wang, P., ... & Yang, R. (2018).

The ApolloScape dataset for autonomous driving. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW).

http://apolloscape.auto

Chang, M. F., Lambert, J., Sangkloy, P., Singh, J., Bak, S., Hartnett, A., ... & Hays, J. (2019).

Argoverse: 3D tracking and forecasting with rich maps. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

https://www.argoverse.org

Park, J., Park, S. W., & Lee, K. M. (2022).

Depth is all you need for monocular 3D detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.10092.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.10092

Liu, Z., Gao, F., & Chen, J. (2021).

LiDAR–camera fusion for road detection using a recurrent neural network. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1–11.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97667-7

Hugging Face. (n.d.).

Monocular depth estimation models. Hugging Face.

https://huggingface.co/models?pipeline_tag=depth-estimation

Papers With Code. (n.d.).

Monocular depth estimation benchmarks. Papers With Code.

https://paperswithcode.com/task/monocular-depth-estimation

Downloads

Posted

2025-07-27