The Role of DNA Repair Systems in Antibiotic Resistance Acquisition: Using CRISPR-Cas9 to Compare HDR and MMEJ in Escherichia coli K-12
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.2569Keywords:
CRISPR-Cas9, Streptomycin, MMEJ, HDRAbstract
Antibiotic resistance is a major challenge in healthcare. A better understanding of how bacteria can develop antibiotic resistance is needed in order to develop more effective antibiotics. This study investigates how bacterial DNA repair mechanisms might contribute to antibiotic resistance, using E. coli K12 and the antibiotic streptomycin as a model system. When E. coli experience double-stranded breaks in their DNA, they repair the damage using either homology-directed repair (HDR), which uses a DNA template to repair the break, or microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ), which often causes random mutations by using small, non-homologous DNA segments. These two repair mechanisms were examined in the rpsL gene, which encodes a protein in E. coli's 30S ribosomal subunit, the target of streptomycin and other aminoglycoside antibiotics. Using CRISPR-Cas9 technology, targeted double-stranded breaks were induced in the rpsL gene of E. coli, and two distinct repair approaches were tested: (a) template-present editing: using HDR to insert a synthetic template containing a K43T resistance-conferring mutation as a positive control, and (b) template-absent editing: forcing MMEJ to create mutations. The bacteria were then grown on streptomycin media to assess resistance development. Template-present editing produced many resistant colonies, confirming the effects of the K43T mutation. More importantly, template-absent modification produced a limited number of resistant colonies, demonstrating that natural MMEJ-induced mutations in the rpsL gene can confer antibiotic resistance. These findings improve our understanding of how DNA repair mechanisms can inadvertently lead to antibiotic resistance and provide crucial insights for developing more effective treatments and monitoring strategies.
References
Adar, S., Izhar, L., Hendel, A., Geacintov, N., & Livneh, Z. (2009). Repair of gaps opposite lesions by homologous recombination in mammalian cells. Nucleic acids research, 37(17), 5737–5748. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp632
De Santo, M., Liguori, C., Paolillo, A., & Pietrosanto, A. (2004). Standard uncertainty evaluation in image-based measurements. Measurement, 36(3-4), 347-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2004.09.011
Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2014). Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science (New York, N.Y.), 346(6213), 1258096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258096
CDC. (2019, July 16). 2019 antibiotic resistance threats report. Centers for Disease Control andPrevention.https://www.cdc.gov/antimicrobial-resistance/data-research/threats/index
Garneau-Tsodikova, S., & Labby, K. J. (2016). Mechanisms of Resistance to Aminoglycoside Antibiotics: Overview and Perspectives. MedChemComm, 7(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5MD00344J
Johnson, J., Daniel, S., Bo-Young, H., Lauren, P., Patrick, D., Lei, C., Shana, L., Blake, H., Hanako, A., Mark, G., Erica, S., & George, W. (2019). Evaluation of 16S rRNA gene sequencing for species and strain-level microbiome analysis. Nat Commun 10, 5029 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13036-1
Martínez-Gálvez, G., Lee, S., Niwa, R., & Woltjen, K. (2024). On the edge of deletion: Using natural and engineered microhomology to edit the human genome. Gene and Genome Editing, 7, 100033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ggedit.2024.100033
Masukawa H. (1969). Localization of sensitivity to kanamycin and streptomycin in 30 S ribosomal proteins of Escherichia coli. The Journal of antibiotics, 22(12), 612–623. https://doi.org/10.7164/antibiotics.22.612
Pelchovich, G., Schreiber, R., Zhuravlev, A., & Gophna, U. (2013). The contribution of common rpsL mutations in Escherichia coli to sensitivity to ribosome-targeting antibiotics. International Journal of Medical Microbiology, 303(8), 558–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.07.006
Seol, J. H., Shim, E. Y., & Lee, S. E. (2018). Microhomology-mediated end joining: Good, bad and ugly. Mutation research, 809, 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2017.07.
Sfeir, A., & Symington, L. S. (2015). Microhomology-Mediated End Joining: A Back-up Survival Mechanism or Dedicated Pathway?. Trends in biochemical sciences, 40(11), 701–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2015.08.
Tatiossian, K. J., Clark, R. D. E., Huang, C., Thornton, M. E., Grubbs, B. H., & Cannon, P. M. (2021). Rational Selection of CRISPR-Cas9 Guide RNAs for Homology-Directed Genome Editing. Molecular Therapy, 29(3), 1057-1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.10.006
van Kampen, S. J., & van Rooij, E. (2019). CRISPR Craze to Transform Cardiac Biology. Trends in molecular medicine, 25(9), 791–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2019.06.008
Wei, W., Qiao, J., Jiang, X., Cai, L., Hu, X., He, J., Chen, M., Yang, M., & Cui, T. (2022). Dehydroquinate Synthase Directly Binds to Streptomycin and Regulates Susceptibility of Mycobacterium bovis to Streptomycin in a Non-canonical Mode. Frontiers in microbiology, 13, 818881. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.818881
Zhu, Y. (2022). Advances in CRISPR/Cas9. BioMed Research International, 2022, 9978571. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9978571
Downloads
Posted
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Noah Allyn

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.