Preprint / Version 1

Colonialism and the Transformation of Traditional Medicine

##article.authors##

  • Ziyue Bi N/A

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.1938

Keywords:

Traditional Medicine, Colonialism , Western biomedicine

Abstract

This paper explores the profound impact of colonialism on traditional medical practices in East and South Asia from 1850 to 1950, highlighting the transformation and integration of indigenous medicine with Western biomedicine. During this period, European powers, particularly the British, French, Dutch, and Portuguese, as well as Japan in its colonies, began to engage with and often marginalize local medical systems. In India, British colonial authorities sought to incorporate Ayurvedic and Unani practices into the colonial health system, partly for economic gain and public health management. Similarly, in Southeast Asia, the Dutch and French explored indigenous medical knowledge for its potential utility. However, traditional practices were often sidelined by Western medicine, which was promoted as superior through the establishment of medical schools and hospitals.

Despite these challenges, traditional medical systems demonstrated remarkable resilience and adaptability. In many cases, they integrated aspects of Western medicine, creating syncretic practices that continue to influence healthcare today. For example, Ayurvedic practitioners in India began incorporating diagnostic tools and treatments from Western medicine, while Kampo in Japan adapted by aligning more closely with scientific methods. This paper also examines the colonial efforts to document and sometimes validate indigenous medical practices, such as the Usman Report in India, which provided a platform for traditional practitioners to advocate for their systems.

While colonial policies initially marginalized and suppressed traditional systems like Ayurveda and Unani, the long-term effects reveal a more complex legacy. The research illustrates that traditional practitioners have been seeking integration with allopathic medicine for over a century, challenging the notion that this is a modern development. Colonial powers, driven by a combination of governance needs and economic interests, documented and incorporated local medical knowledge into their healthcare systems, albeit in ways that often subordinated indigenous practices to Western medicine.

References

Macaulay, T. B. Minute on Indian education. (1835).

Mukharji, P. B. The stethoscope and making of modern Ayurveda, Bengal, c. 1894–1952.

Sivin, N. Chinese Medicine in Contemporary China: Plurality and Synthesis. Duke University Press, 1987.

Lo, V. Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine in the People's Republic of China. University of Chicago Press, 1982.

Maciocia, G. The Foundations of Chinese Medicine: A Comprehensive Text for Acupuncturists and Herbalists. Churchill Livingstone, 2005.

Zhang, X. Modernizing Traditional Chinese Medicine: Policies and Practices in the People's Republic of China. Routledge, 2013.

Chen, H. Traditional Chinese Medicine in the Global Age: Challenges and Opportunities. Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.

Wujastyk, D. The Roots of Ayurveda: Selections from Sanskrit Medical Writings. Penguin Classics, 2003.

Sharma, P. V. Charaka Samhita: A Scientific Synopsis. Chaukhamba Orientalia, 1981.

Valiathan, M. S. The Legacy of Caraka. Orient Blackswan, 2003.

Kumar, D. Science and the Raj: A Study of British India. Oxford University Press, 1995.

Bala, P. Imperialism and Medicine in Bengal: A Socio-Historical Perspective. SAGE Publications, 1991.

Arnold, D. Colonizing the Body: State Medicine and Epidemic Disease in Nineteenth-Century India. University of California Press, 1993.

Alter, J. S. Asian Medicine and Globalization. University of Pennsylvania Press, 2005.

Zysk, K. G. Asceticism and Healing in Ancient India: Medicine in the Buddhist Monastery. Oxford University Press, 1991.

Ministry of AYUSH, Government of India. About the Ministry. Retrieved from https://ayush.gov.in (n.d.).

Patwardhan, B., et al. Ayurveda and Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Comparative Overview. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine , 2015.

Bodeker, G., & Kariippanon, K. Traditional medicine and indigenous health in indigenous hands. Global Health, Epidemiology and Genomics .

Lei, S. H.-L. Neither Donkey nor Horse: Medicine in the Struggle over China's Modernity. University of Chicago Press, 2014.

Liebeskind, C. Arguing science: Unani tibb, hakims and biomedicine in India, 1900-50. in Plural Medicine, Tradition and Modernity, 1800-2000 , 58-75. Routledge, 2002.

Lock, M. East Asian Medicine in Urban Japan: Varieties of Medical Experience. University of California Press, 1980.

Otsuka, Y. Kampo: Japanese traditional medicine. Medical History , 54 (1), 121-134. (2010).

Scheid, V. Chinese Medicine in Contemporary China: Plurality and Synthesis. Duke University Press, 2002.

Usman, M. The Report of the Committee on the Indigenous Systems of Medicine, Madras [1921–1923]. Government of Madras, Ministry of Local Self-Government, Committee on the Indigenous Systems of Medicine, 1923.

Wujastyk, D., & Smith, F. M. Modern and Global Ayurveda: Pluralism and Paradigms. SUNY Press, 2008.

Downloads

Posted

2024-11-05