Preprint / Version 1

Preventing roadkill incidents

comparison of methods, what we know, what needs improvement

##article.authors##

  • Nayeon Bang polygence

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.1886

Keywords:

wildlife-vehicle collisions, environmental science, biology

Abstract

The wildlife-vehicle collisions (WVCs) have led to significant roadkill incidents, causing a great threat to the animal population and biodiversity. This paper compares various WVC prevention methods, focusing on their effectiveness in wildlife fatalities. The study reviews both the physical (fencing, crossing structure, and sign signal) and olfactory methods (using odor to prevent WVCs). Data from multiple studies are compiled and visualized as graphs. This study suggests that fencing is the most effective method, especially when it is used with crossing structures. The study emphasizes the importance of combining methods for optimal results and calls for further research to address gaps in the research. 

Keywords: roadkill, wildlife-vehicle collision (WVCs), prevention, methods, physical, chemical, biological, olfactory

References

Pagany, R. (2020). Wildlife-vehicle collisions - Influencing factors, data collection, and research methods. Biological Conservation, 251, 108758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108758

‌Seiler A. The toll of the automobile: Wildlife and roads in Sweden. Dissertation, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden. 2003

Chyn, K., Lin, T.-E., Wilkinson, D. P., Tracy, J. L., A. Michelle Lawing, & Fitzgerald, L. A. (2020). Fine-scale roadkill risk models: understanding the intersection of wildlife and roads. Biodiversity and Conservation, 30(1), 139–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-020-02083-6

Grilo, C., Borda‐de‐Água, L., Beja, P., Goolsby, E., Soanes, K., Roux, A. L., Koroleva, E., Ferreira, F. Z., Gagné, S. A., Wang, Y., & González‐Suárez, M. (2021). Conservation threats from roadkill in the global road network. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 30(11), 2200–2210. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13375

‌Latch, E. K., Gee, K. L., Webb, S. L., Honeycutt, R. L., DeYoung, R. W., Gonzales, R. A., Demarais, S., & Toby, R. (2021). Genetic Consequences of Fence Confinement in a Population of White-Tailed Deer. Diversity, 13(3), 126. https://doi.org/10.3390/d13030126

Clevenger, A. P. (2002, April 5). Drainage culverts as habitat linkages and factors affecting passage by mammals - Clevenger - 2001 - Journal of Applied Ecology - Wiley Online Library. British Ecological Society. https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.0021-8901.2001.00678.x

Mastro, L., Conover, M., & Frey, S. (n.d.). Human-Wildlife Interactions Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for 2008 Deer-vehicle collision prevention techniques Deer-vehicle collision prevention techniques. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1074&context=hwi

‌Clevenger, A. P., Chruszcz, B., Gunson, K., & Wierzchowski, J. (2002). Roads and wildlife in the Canadian Rocky Mountain Parks-Movements, mortality and mitigation. Final report. Prepared for Parks Canada, Banff, Alberta, Canada.

Bassani, R., & Re, S. (n.d.). Prioritizing road sections for wildlife fencing to reduce road mortality. Retrieved October 21, 2024, from https://webthesis.biblio.polito.it/secure/13055/1/tesi.pdf

‌Hildreth, A. M., Lawyer, W. L., Hygnstrom, S. E., Johnson, B. L., & Vercauteren, K. C. (2020). Effectiveness of Fences and Undercrossings to Mitigate Deer-Vehicle Collisions on Interstate 80 in Eastern Nebraska. DigitalCommons@USU. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/wdmconference/2013/all2013/19/

‌Wulandari, P. S., Lestyana, H. R., Johnson, & Tranggono, J. F. (2021). Sustainable road-kill mitigation in Gladak Perak Bridge at Lumajang, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 907(1), 012028–012028. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/907/1/012028

‌Mastro, L. L., Conover, M. R., & Frey, S. N. (2008). Deer–vehicle collision prevention techniques. Human-Wildlife Conflicts, 2(1), 80-92.

Bond, A. R., & Jones, D. N. (2013). Roads and macropods: interactions and implications. Australian Mammalogy, 36(1), 1-14.

Huijser, M. P., & Kociolek, A. V. (2008). Wildlife-vehicle collision and crossing mitigation measures: a literature review for Blaine County, Idaho. Western Transportation Institute, Montana State University, Bozeman.

Kim, K., Yi, Y., Woo, D., Park, T., & Song, E. (2021). Factors influencing roadkill hotspot in the Republic of Korea. Proceedings of the National Institute of Ecology of the Republic of Korea, 2(4), 274-278.

Meyer, E. (2006). Assessing the effectiveness of deer warning signs (No. K-TRAN: KU-03-6). Kansas. Dept. of Transportation.

Huijser, M. P., Mosler‐Berger, C., Olsson, M., & Strein, M. (2015). Wildlife warning signs and animal detection systems aimed at reducing wildlife‐vehicle collisions. Handbook of road ecology, 198-212.

Wölfel, H., & Krüger, H.-. (1995). Zur Gestaltung von Wilddurchlässen an Autobahnen. Zeitschrift F Ur Jagdwissenschaft, 41(3), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02239950

Yanes, M., Velasco, J. M., & Suárez, F. (1995). Permeability of roads and railways to vertebrates: the importance of culverts. Biological conservation, 71(3), 217-222.

Mitigation of barrier effect of linear infrastructure on wildlife | Wageningen University and Research Library catalog. (n.d.). https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/titel/1004551

Balčiauskas, L., & Jasiulionis, M. (2012). Reducing the incidence of mammals on public highways using chemical repellent. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 7(2), 92-97.

Bíl, M., Andrášik, R., Bartonička, T., Křivánková, Z., & Sedoník, J. (2018). An evaluation of odor repellent effectiveness in prevention of wildlife-vehicle collisions. Journal of environmental management, 205, 209-214.

Andreassen, H. P., Gundersen, H., & Storaas, T. (2005). The effect of scent‐marking, forest clearing, and supplemental feeding on moose‐train collisions. The Journal of wildlife management, 69(3), 1125-1132.

Kušta, T., Keken, Z., Ježek, M., & Kůta, Z. (2015). Effectiveness and costs of odor repellents in wildlife–vehicle collisions: A case study in Central Bohemia, Czech Republic. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 38, 1-5.

Elmeros, M., Winbladh, J. K., Andersen, P. N., Madsen, A. B., & Christensen, J. T. (2011). Effectiveness of odourZ., Wimmerová, L., Šolcová, O., Kušta, T., & Dvořáková, P. (2024). Olfactory Repellents in Road Ecology: What We Know and What to Focus on in the Future. Sustainability, 16(14), 5920.

Raymond, S., Schwartz, A. L., Thomas, R. J., Chadwick, E., & Perkins, S. E. (2021). Temporal patterns of wildlife roadkill in the UK. PLoS One, 16(10), e0258083.

Rytwinski, T., Soanes, K., Jaeger, J. A. G., Fahrig, L., Findlay, C. S., Houlahan, J., Ree, R. van der, & Grift, E. A. van der. (2016, November 21). How effective is road mitigation at Reducing Road-Kill? A meta-analysis. PLOS ONE. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0166941

Downloads

Posted

2024-10-28