Preprint / Version 1

Technology and Policy for Plant Genetic Engineering

The Role of Nanomaterials

##article.authors##

  • Imaya Ambati High School Student

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.1678

Keywords:

plant genetics, engineering, biology

Abstract

Food insecurity remains a common issue within the under-resourced communities of many nations. Genetic engineering of plants provides us a new method to improve agricultural yields, and thus help curtail food insecurity. Plant genetic engineering still faces limitations such as ongoing disputes with the ethicalities of such methods, along with several technical barriers. Nanomaterials are an emerging technology that can potentially surpass technical barriers, but we must still consider the development of regulations for them and their impact. In this Review, the potential of nanotechnology to enable the rapid growth of genetically modified plants is discussed, as well as potential policy/social implications for using nanotechnology in agriculture.

References

References

Gibson, M. Food Security—A Commentary: What Is It and Why Is It So Complicated? Foods 1, 18–27 (2012).

Reinhardt, K. & Fanzo, J. Addressing Chronic Malnutrition through Multi-Sectoral, Sustainable Approaches: A Review of the Causes and Consequences. Front. Nutr. 1, (2014).

Schmidt-Traub, G., Obersteiner, M. & Mosnier, A. Fix the broken food system in three steps. Nature 569, 181–183 (2019).

Mmbando, G. S. The legal aspect of the current use of genetically modified organisms in Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda. GM Crops Food 14, 1–12 (2023).

Hofmann, T. et al. Technology readiness and overcoming barriers to sustainably implement nanotechnology-enabled plant agriculture. Nat. Food 1, 416–425 (2020).

Paarlberg, R. A dubious success: The NGO campaign against GMOs. GM Crops Food 5, 223–228 (2014).

The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2024. (FAO; IFAD; UNICEF; WFP; WHO;, 2024). doi:10.4060/cd1254en.

Squire, H. J., Tomatz, S., Voke, E., González-Grandío, E. & Landry, M. The emerging role of nanotechnology in plant genetic engineering. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 1, 314–328 (2023).

Demirer, G. S. et al. Nanotechnology to advance CRISPR–Cas genetic engineering of plants. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 243–250 (2021).

Altammar, K. A. A review on nanoparticles: characteristics, synthesis, applications, and challenges. Front. Microbiol. 14, 1155622 (2023).

Alshawwa, S. Z., Kassem, A. A., Farid, R. M., Mostafa, S. K. & Labib, G. S. Nanocarrier Drug Delivery Systems: Characterization, Limitations, Future Perspectives and Implementation of Artificial Intelligence. Pharmaceutics 14, 883 (2022).

Demirer, G. S. et al. High aspect ratio nanomaterials enable delivery of functional genetic material without DNA integration in mature plants. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 456–464 (2019).

Zhang, H. et al. Gold-Nanocluster-Mediated Delivery of siRNA to Intact Plant Cells for Efficient Gene Knockdown. Nano Lett. 21, 5859–5866 (2021).

Zhao, X. et al. Pollen magnetofection for genetic modification with magnetic nanoparticles as gene carriers. Nat. Plants 3, 956–964 (2017).

Vejlupkova, Z. et al. No evidence for transient transformation via pollen magnetofection in several monocot species. Nat. Plants 6, 1323–1324 (2020).

Khaipho-Burch, M. et al. Genetic modification can improve crop yields — but stop overselling it. Nature 621, 470–473 (2023).

De Souza, A. P. et al. Soybean photosynthesis and crop yield are improved by accelerating recovery from photoprotection. Science 377, 851–854 (2022).

Wu, F. et al. Allow Golden Rice to save lives. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 118, e2120901118 (2021).

Islam, M. R. et al. DNA Delivery by Virus-Like Nanocarriers in Plant Cells. Nano Lett. 24, 7833–7842 (2024).

Wang, J. W. et al. Nanoparticles for protein delivery in planta. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 60, 102052 (2021).

Lassoued, R., Phillips, P. W. B., Smyth, S. J. & Hesseln, H. Estimating the cost of regulating genome edited crops: expert judgment and overconfidence. GM Crops Food 10, 44–62 (2019).

Van Acker, R., Rahman, M. M. & Cici, S. Z. H. Pros and Cons of GMO Crop Farming. in Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science (Oxford University Press, 2017). doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.217.

Sandhu, R., Chaudhary, N., Shams, R. & Dash, K. K. Genetically modified crops and sustainable development: navigating challenges and opportunities. Food Sci. Biotechnol. (2024) doi:10.1007/s10068-024-01669-y.

Lee, H. Teff, A Rising Global Crop: Current Status of Teff Production and Value Chain. Open Agric. J. 12, 185–193 (2018).

Allan, J. et al. Regulatory landscape of nanotechnology and nanoplastics from a global perspective. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 122, 104885 (2021).

Fadeel, B. & Kostarelos, K. Grouping all carbon nanotubes into a single substance category is scientifically unjustified. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 164–164 (2020).

Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity: Text and Annexes. (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, 2000).

Kolodziejczyk, B. Nanotechnology, Nanowaste and Their Effects on Ecosystems: A Need for Efficient Monitoring, Disposal and Recycling. (2016).

GMO. European Food Safety Authority https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/topics/topic/gmo.

Nanotechnology. European Food Safety Authority https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/topics/topic/nanotechnology.

Textiles — Environmental aspects — Vocabulary. (2023).

ISO/TC 229 - Nanotechnologies. ISO https://www.iso.org/committee/381983.html (2005).

Turnbull, C., Lillemo, M. & Hvoslef-Eide, T. A. K. Global Regulation of Genetically Modified Crops Amid the Gene Edited Crop Boom – A Review. Front. Plant Sci. 12, 630396 (2021).

Hilbeck, A., Meyer, H., Wynne, B. & Millstone, E. GMO regulations and their interpretation: how EFSA’s guidance on risk assessments of GMOs is bound to fail. Environ. Sci. Eur. 32, 54 (2020).

Downloads

Posted

2024-09-25

Categories