Preprint / Version 1

River Rescue: Identifying iNaturalist Animals via Gamification

##article.authors##

  • Jaiden Lee Millburn High School

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.104

Keywords:

Serious Games, Computer Science, Game Development, Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract

There has been a recent trend in using gamification (that is using game design in non-game scenarios) to attract new citizen scientists and make citizen science tasks more enjoyable. Most of the current research in gamification makes use of points, badges, and leaderboards. However, not much research has been done on adding different forms of gameplay. Thus, this study investigates the possibility of using gameplay to encourage participation in citizen science. In this paper, I conducted an experiment to evaluate whether adding hyper casual gameplay to a citizen-science application can influence user engagement while classifying observations of animals from iNaturalist (an online, global biodiversity index). I developed 2 games under the name of River Rescue: one with a casual gameplay aspect and one without, with participants being randomly assigned to each group. Results indicate that, for this group of participants, adding a casual gameplay aspect did not significantly impact user engagement. However, based on participant suggestions and qualitative data collected, my findings suggest that future work might want to research fast-paced games with progression, making sure to avoid repetitive/tedious tasks and to minimize loading times.  

References

A. Wiggins and K. Crowston, "From Conservation to Crowdsourcing: A Typology of Citizen Science," 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2011, pp. 1-10, doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2011.207.

Alexandra Eveleigh, Charlene Jennett, Ann Blandford, Philip Brohan, and Anna L. Cox. 2014. Designing for dabblers and deterring drop-outs in citizen science. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2985–2994. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557262

Bogost, I. (2011, May 3). Persuasive Games: Exploitationware. Game Developer. Retrieved December 13, 2022, from https://www.gamedeveloper.com/design/persuasive-games-exploitationware

Bowser, Anne & Hansen, Derek & He, Yurong & Boston, Carol & Reid, Matthew & Gunnell, Logan & Preece, Jennifer. (2013). Using gamification to inspire new citizen science volunteers. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. 10.1145/2583008.2583011.

Curtis, V. (2014). Online citizen science games: Opportunities for the biological sciences. Applied & Translational Genomics, 3(4), 90-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atg.2014.07.001

Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining ''gamification''. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments, Tampere, Finland.

Franzoni, C., & Sauermann, H. (2014). Crowd science: The organization of scientific research in open collaborative projects. Research Policy, 43(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.005

Hamari, J. (2017). Do badges increase user activity? A field experiment on the effects of gamification. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 469-478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.036

Huang, Biyun & Hew, Khe. (2015). Do points, badges and leaderboard increase learning and activity: A quasi-experiment on the effects of gamification.

Hung, A.C. (2017). A Critique and Defense of Gamification. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 15, 57-72.

Prestopnik, N. R., & Tang, J. (2015). Points, stories, worlds, and diegesis: Comparing player experiences in two citizen science games. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 492-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.051

Downloads

Posted

2023-01-05