Do ESG companies in Saudi Arabia outperform market risk factors Empirical Evidence from the Tadawul Exchange
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.800Keywords:
ESG, Saudi Arabia, market risk factorsAbstract
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) is an approach aimed at increasing sustainability and promoting ethical and responsible practices. Although it is yet to be mandatory in Saudi Arabia and is still in its early stages, this has resulted in ignorance of ESG, as the benefit remains unclear. A 2021 Murad Ali did a study on ESG reporting in Saudi Arabia and found that there is a significant gap in ESG reporting in Saudi Arabia, indicating that ESG in Saudi Arabia may not be mature enough to be considered. Additionally, a 2020 research paper by Hussein Mohammad Salameh that used the 5-factor model, 3-factor model and CAPM concluded that due to the nature of the Tadawul exchange being different to the rest of the world due to Islamic Sharia and laws, it is challenging to find accurate results. This research paper aims to run a linear regression using the Carhart Four Factor Model to five portfolios that consist of the top 50 ESG firms in the Saudi Arabia Stock Exchange (Tadawul) to uncover if firms more aligned with ESG are outperforming market risk factors. Empirically, the results show that the top 20 ESG firms in Saudi Arabia outperform market risk factors on a consistent basis; more specifically, the p-value rejects the null hypothesis, which indicates ESG outperforming regular stocks on a risk-adjusted basis, with the rest accepting the null hypothesis. The results suggest that while ESG is still a new topic in the business world, firms that are implementing it may benefit in the Tadawul Exchange. It is worth noting that the majority of the firms in the highest-rated portfolio were banks and telecom firms, which could invalidate the result. Further research is necessary to conclude the impact of ESG on returns.
References
-1. Saudi Arabia’s Stock Exchange, Tadawul, Announces Its Voluntary Commitment to
Promoting Sustainable and Transparent Capital Markets." Sustainable Stock Exchanges Initiative, 17 Dec. 2018
-2. Murad, Ali, et al. The Impact of Social Performance on Financial Performance of Listed
Companies in Saudi Arabia Prepared By. 2021.
-3. Mohammad Salameh, Hussein. “Application of Asset Pricing Models: Evidence from Saudi Exchange.” Investment Management and Financial Innovations, vol. 17, no. 1, 6 Apr. 2020, pp. 348–368, https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.17(1).2020.29. Accessed 11 May 2020.
-4. Aldaarmi, Abdulaziz, et al. Implement Fama and French and Capital Asset Pricing Models in Saudi Arabia Stock Market. 2015, www.researchgate.net/publication/281887582_Implement_Fama_And_French_And_
Capital_Asset_Pricing_Models_In_Saudi_Arabia_Stock_Market.
-5. "Sustainability Excellence: ESG Invest." Sustainability Excellence,
https://sustainabilityexcellence.com/esg-invest/.
-6. Efficient Markets Hypothesis - Understanding and Testing EMH.” Corporate Finance
Institute, 24 July2019,corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/knowledge/tradinginvesting/efficient-markets-hypothesis/.
-7. Fama, Eugene F, and Kenneth R French. “The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 18, no. 3, Aug. 2004, pp. 25–46, www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/0895330042162430, https://doi.org/10.1257/0895330042162430.
-8. Fama, Eugene F., and Kenneth R. French. “The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns.” The Journal of Finance, vol. 47, no. 2, June 1992, pp. 427–465, www.jstor.org/stable/2329112, https://doi.org/10.2307/2329112.
-9. Carhart, Mark M. “On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance.” The Journal of Finance, vol. 52, no. 1, Mar. 1997, p. 57, https://doi.org/10.2307/2329556.
-10. Eraslan, Veysel. “Fama and French Three-Factor Model: Evidence from Istanbul Stock Exchange.” Business and Economics Research Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, 2013, econpapers.repec.org/article/risbuecrj/0116.htm.
-11. Shaker, Mohamed Ahmed, and Khairy Elgiziry. “Comparisons of Asset Pricing Models in the
Egyptian Stock Market.” Accounting and Finance Research, vol. 3, no. 4, 9 Sept.
, https://doi.org/10.5430/afr.v3n4p24.
-12. Chen, Simin, et al. “Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance and
Financial Outcomes: Analyzing the Impact of ESG on Financial Performance.” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 345, 1 Nov. 2023, pp. 118829–118829, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118829.
-13. “Sustainability at Bugaboo | Bugaboo.” Www.bugaboo.com, www.bugaboo.com/us-en/sustainability/.
-14. Wu, Jing, and Chee Yoong Liew. “Green Finance and Environmental, Social, and
Governance: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies.” Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 4 Oct. 2023, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37792189/, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-30139-x.
-15. Smith, William T. “Do Environmental, Social and Governance Practices Affect Portfolio
Returns? Evidence from the US Stock Market from 2002 to 2020.” Review of Accounting and Finance, vol. 22, no. 1, 2023, pp. 37–61, ideas.repec.org/a/eme/rafpps/raf-02-2022-0046.html.
-16. “Kenneth R. French - Data Library.” Mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu, mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.html#Developed.
-17. Chen, James. “Jensen’s Measure.” Investopedia, 30 Sept. 2020, www.investopedia.com/terms/j/jensensmeasure.asp#:~:text=The%20Jensen.
Downloads
Posted
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Abdulrahman Alrajhi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.