Preprint / Version 1

The new Viet rationale: An empirical study on the degree of rationality in Vietnamese undergraduate students

##article.authors##

  • Anh Do Mahindra United World College of India
  • Phuc Huynh VNU-HCM High School for the Gifted
  • Muhammad Shalahudin Central Toronto Academy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.712

Keywords:

rational, rationality, logical, reasoning, game theory, Bayesian theorem, Bayesian reasoning, Empiricism, Vietnam, Vietnamese, Undergraduate, Students, Young, Youth

Abstract

More than three decades have passed since the introduction of the Đổi Mới reform (1986), marking Vietnam's transition to a socialist-oriented market economy. The drastic shift from a command economy resulted in sweeping educational and social changes, drawing from a plethora of external influences (Drummond, 2006). These changes are incoherent with the contextual periods in which many of the world's mainstream psychological and economic theories emerged, such as Homo Economicus. The empirical study explores the degree of rational reasoning in Vietnamese undergraduate students on a range of metrics and its implications in the Vietnamese context. Through qualitative and quantitative analysis of a stratified sample in Ho Chi Minh City, the results suggest that undergraduate students possess a high degree of self-criticism while lacking strategic considerations when faced with situations involving game theory. The overall result shows that there is a positive relationship between the number of years in college and the degree of rationality, with male participants outperforming female participants. This paper ends with a discussion of possible factors (i.e. media and Confucianism) related to these disparities and the potential political, economic, and social implications of the findings.

References

Bonchek, M. S., & Shepsle, K. A. (1997). Analyzing politics. Rationality, Behavior and Institutions.

Cain, G. (2013). Kill one to warn one hundred. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 19(1), 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161213508814

Choi, S., Kariv, S., Müller, W., & Silverman, D. (2011). Who is (More) rational? https://doi.org/10.3386/w16791

Drummond, L. (2006). Gender in Post-Doi Moi Vietnam: Women, desire, and change. Gender Place and Culture, 13(3), 247–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/09663690600700998

Grant, S., & Van Zandt, T. (2007). Expected utility theory. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1033982

Gerlach, P. (2017). The games economists play: Why economics students behave more selfishly than other students. PLOS ONE, 12(9), e0183814. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183814

Henrich, J., Heine, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29. https://doi.org/10.1038/466029a

Johnson‐Laird, P. N., Girotto, V., & Legrenzi, P. (2004). Reasoning From Inconsistency to Consistency. Psychological Review, 111(3), 640–661. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.111.3.640

Kallestrup, J., & Pritchard, D. (2016). From epistemic Anti-Individualism to intellectual humility. Res Philosophica, 93(3), 533–552. https://doi.org/10.11612/resphil.2016.93.3.2

Khương, N. V., Phuong, N. T., Liem, N. T., Thuy, C. T. M., & Son, T. H. (2022). Factors Affecting the Intention to Use Financial Technology among Vietnamese Youth: Research in the Time of COVID-19 and Beyond. Economies, 10(3), 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10030057

Lewis, A. B. (2018). What does bad information look like? using the CRAAP test for evaluating substandard resources. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 88. https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1724

Lindner, J. R., Murphy, T. H., & Briers, G. E. (2001). Handling nonresponse in social science research. Journal of agricultural education, 42(4), 43-53.

Malesky, E. J. (2021). Enhancing Research on Authoritarian Regimes through Detailed Comparisons of China and Vietnam. Problems of Post-Communism, 68(3), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2020.1865822

McCune, S., & Matthews, M. (1975). Eliminating Sexism : Teacher Education and Change. Journal of Teacher Education, 26(4), 294–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248717502600404

Mischel, W., & Baker, N. L. (1975). Cognitive appraisals and transformations in delay behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(2), 254–261. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076272

Molyneux, L. (2017). Multiplatform news consumption and its connections to civic engagement. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 20(6), 788–806. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917730216

Mun, J. (2015). The Impact of Confucianism on Gender (In)Equality in Asia. Georgetown Journal of Gender & Law, 16, 633. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/grggenl16&div=29&id=&page=

Murray, T. (2008, August). Exploring epistemic wisdom: Ethical and practical implications of integral theory and methodological pluralism for collaboration and knowledge-building. In 1st Biannual Integral Theory Conference, John F. Kennedy University. Pleasant Hill, CA.

Nguyen, A., & Özçağlar–Toulouse, N. (2021). Nation branding as a market-shaping strategy: A study on South Korean products in Vietnam. Journal of Business Research, 122, 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.029

Pinker, S. (2018). Enlightenment Now: the case for reason, science, humanism, and progress. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BB27073425

Pinker, S. (2021). Rationality: What It Is, Why It Seems Scarce, Why It Matters. Penguin UK.

Rabin, M. (1998). Psychology and Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1), 11–46. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2564950

Raworth, K. (2017). A Doughnut for the Anthropocene: humanity’s compass in the 21st century. The Lancet Planetary Health, 1(2), e48–e49. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2542-5196(17)30028-1

Turner, L. H., Dindia, K., & Pearson, J. C. (1995). An investigation of female/male verbal behaviors in same‐sex and mixed‐sex conversations. Communication Reports, 8(2), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934219509367614

Welch, A. (2009). Internationalisation of Vietnamese Higher Education: retrospect and prospect. In Higher education dynamics (pp. 197–213). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3694-0_14

White, J. D. (2020). The enduring appeal of autocrats. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 33(6), 925–930. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2020.1838820

Wong, P. T. P., & Cowden, R. G. (2022). Accelerating the science and practice of psychology beyond WEIRD biases: Enriching the landscape through Asian psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1054519

Downloads

Posted

2023-11-13