Preprint / Version 1

REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS IN THE SECOND WAVE: THE LEGACY OF THE PLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF CONNECTICUT

##article.authors##

  • Isabella Bonaccorso Flintridge Preparatory School

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.422

Keywords:

reproductive rights, second wave feminism, planned parenthood

Abstract

This essay explores the historical context of the reproductive rights movement within second-wave feminism in the United States. It focuses on the pivotal role of the Planned Parenthood League of Connecticut and the landmark Supreme Court case, Griswold v. Connecticut. The essay highlights the fight for legal and safe contraceptive use as a starting point for reproductive rights activism. It discusses the leadership of Estelle Griswold and the legislative wins achieved in the 1960s and 1970s. The essay also delves into the ideologies of "sexual politics" and the belief that personal experiences were shaped by social structures and inequalities. It highlights the fight for legal and safe contraceptive use as a starting point for the reproductive rights movement. Additionally, it examines the impact of Griswold v. Connecticut in establishing the right to privacy and its implications for the feminist movement. The essay concludes by addressing the ongoing challenges faced by reproductive rights advocates and the significance of this movement for women's rights overall.

References

Bailey, Martha J. “‘Momma’s Got the Pill’: How Anthony Comstock and Griswold v. Connecticut Shaped US Childbearing.” The American Economic Review 100, no. 1 (2010): 98–129. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/27804923.>

Baker, Jean H. Margaret Sanger: A Life of Passion. New York: Hill & Wang, 2011.

Bollier, David. Crusaders & Criminals, Victims & Visionaries: Historic Encounters between Connecticut Citizens and the United States Supreme Court. Hartford, CT: Office of the Attorney General, 1986.

Brooks, Carol Flora. “The Early History of the Anti-Contraceptive Laws in Massachusetts and Connecticut.” American Quarterly 18, no. 1 (1966). <https://doi.org/10.2307/2711107.>

Byrnes, Robert D. "Birth Control Law of State Nullified: U.S. Supreme Court, in 7 to 2 Opinion, Holds Statute Passed in 1879 is Unconstitutional." The Hartford Courant (1923-), Jun 08, 1965.<https://www.proquest.com/historical-newspapers/birth-control-law-state-nullified/docview/548842903/se-2.>

Congress.gov. "Text - H.R.3755 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Women's Health Protection Act of 2021." February 28, 2022. <https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/3755/text.>

Defeat in Connecticut, Outlook & Independent, April 15, 1931, at 518.

Dennett, Mary W. Birth Control Laws: Shall We Keep Them, Change Them or Abolish Them. F. H. Hitchcock, 1926.

Dey, Eleanor Klibanoff and Sneha.“Texas Family Planning Clinics Require Parental Consent for Birth Control Following Court Ruling.” The Texas Tribune. January 3, 2023. <https://www.texastribune.org/2023/01/03/title-x-federal-court-ruling-birth-control/.>

Dienes, C. Thomas. Law, Politics, and Birth Control. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 1972.

Dudziak, Mary L. “Just Say No: Birth Control in the Connecticut Supreme Court Before Griswold v. Connecticut .” Iowa Law Review 75 (1990).

Estelle Griswold, interview by Jeanette B. Cheek, Fort Myers, Florida, March 17, 1976, interview XI, transcript, Schlesinger Library, Harvard Radcliffe Institute, Cambridge, MA.

Friedan, Betty. The Feminine Mystique. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2013.

“Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965).” Justia Law. Accessed February 9, 2023. <https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/381/479/.>

"Griswold v. Connecticut." Oyez. Accessed February 7, 2023. <https://www.oyez.org/cases/1964/496.>

Klibanoff, Eleanor. “Federal Court Ruling May Prevent Texas Teens from Getting Birth Control without Parental Permission.” The Texas Tribune. December 21, 2022. <https://www.texastribune.org/2022/12/21/texas-title-x-teens-birth-control/.>

Kline, Wendy. Bodies of knowledge: Sexuality, Reproduction, and Women’s Health in the Second Wave. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.

“Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003).” Justia Law. Accessed February 9, 2023. <https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/539/558/>

Lepore, Jill. “Sex and the Supreme Court.” The New Yorker, May 18, 2015. <https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/05/25/to-have-and-to-hold.>

Linn, Duvall Harwell. "Griswold v. Connecticut." New York Times (1923-), Sep 14, 1990, <https://www.proquest.com/historical-newspapers/griswold-v-connecticut/docview/ 108497855/se-2.>

McCammon, Sarah. “Why Anti-Abortion Groups Are Citing the Ideas of a 19th-Century ‘Vice Reformer.’” NPR, April 18, 2023. <https://www.npr.org/2023/04/18/1170371877/abortion-pill-mifepristone-judge-comstock.>

Mersky Roy M., Compiler; Duffy, Jill, Compiler. Documentary History of the Legal Aspects of Abortion in the United States: Griswold v. Connecticut. Littleton, CO, Fred B. Rothman Publications.

Parke, Richard, Special to THE NEW YORK TIMES United Press, International Telephoto. "2 AT BIRTH CLINIC ARE FOUND GUILTY: CONNECTICUT LAW 'ABSOLUTE,' NEW HAVEN JUDGE SAYS ARRESTED IN NOVEMBER." New York Times (1923-), Jan 03, 1962. <https://www.proquest.com/historical-newspapers/2-at-birth-clinic-are-found-guilty/docview/115844484/se-2.>

Perrone, Matthew. “What Does the Comstock Act, a Law from the 1870s, Have to Do with Abortion Pills?” PBS, April 8, 2023. <https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-does-comstock-act-a-law-from-the-1870s-have-to-do-with-abortion-pills.>

"Poe v. Ullman." Oyez. Accessed May 10, 2023. <https://www.oyez.org/cases/1960/60.>

Reardon, Andi. “Griswold v. Connecticut: Landmark Case Remembered.” The New York Times. The New York Times, May 28, 1989. <https://www.nytimes.com/1989/05/28/nyregion/griswold-v-connecticut-landmark-case-remembered.html.>

“Second Wave Feminism: Collections.” Second Wave Feminism Primary Sources & History. Accessed May 15, 2023. <https://www.gale.com/primary-sources/womens-studies/collections/second-wave-feminism.>

Sneed, Tierney. “Supreme Court's Decision on Abortion Could Open the Door to Overturn Same-Sex Marriage, Contraception and Other Major Rulings | CNN Politics.” CNN. Cable News Network, June 24, 2022. <https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/24/politics/abortion-ruling-gay-rights-contraceptives/index.html>

Sohn, Amy. Man Who Hated Women: Sex, Censorship, and Civil Liberties in the Gilded Age. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2021.

“Texas Judge’s Ruling on Birth Control Threatens a Nationwide Program for Minors.” 2023. PBS NewsHour. March 7, 2023. <https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/texas-judges-ruling-on-birth-control-threatens-a-nationwide-program-for-minors.>

“The Door Was Open! Will You Help to Open It Again?” (Planned Parenthood League of Connecticut, Inc., New Haven, CT., 1961)

“The Pill and the Women’s Liberation Movement.” PBS. Accessed May 14, 2023. <https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/pill-and-womens-liberation-movement/.>

Tindall, George Brown, and David E. Shi. America: A Narrative History: Volume 2. New York , New York: W W Norton & Co, 2010.

“Title X: Affordable Birth Control and Reproductive Health Care.” n.d. Planned Parenhood <https://www.plannedparenthoodaction.org/issues/health-care-equity/title-x#:~:text=Title%20X%3A%20The%20Nation.>

U.S. Congress. United States Code: Obscenity, 18 U.S.C. §§ -1464 Suppl. 3 1946. 1946. Periodical. <https://www.loc.gov/item/uscode1946-008018071/.>

Wermiel, Stephen J. “Human Rights Hero: The Supreme Court in ‘Griswold v. Connecticut.’” Human Rights 41, no. 4 (2016). <http://www.jstor.org/stable/26423460.>

Zimmerman, Diane. “Who Put the Right in the Right of Publicity? .” DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Law 9, no. 31 (1998). <https://doi.org/https://via.library.depaul.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1304&context=jatip.>

Downloads

Posted

2023-09-12