Literature Review and Validation of Anomaly Detection in Spacecraft Telemetry Data
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.4120Keywords:
Spacecraft Telemetry, model compression, onboard machine learningAbstract
Spacecraft anomaly detection is critical for mission safety, but deploying capable models on space-grade hardware remains a practical barrier. Ground-based monitoring introduces delays that grow with distance and disappear entirely during communication blackouts, while on-board systems are constrained by processors that are orders of magnitude less powerful than their ground counterparts. This paper evaluates whether an existing LSTM-based detection pipeline can be adapted and compressed to better meet those constraints without sacrificing detection capability. Using the ESA Anomaly Detection Benchmark Mission 1 lightweight subset, the Telemanom framework from Hundman et al. (2018) is replicated, tuned, and quantized across three phases. Phase 1 establishes a baseline CEF0.5 score of 43.57%. Phase 2 adjusts two hardcoded parameters originally calibrated for NASA telemetry, bringing CEF0.5 to 81.0% — a substantial improvement that demonstrates the sensitivity of threshold-based anomaly scoring to dataset-specific error distributions. Phase 3 applies post-training quantization, compressing the model from 310.7 KB to 91.9 KB while preserving prediction accuracy within 0.14% of the original output, establishing a path to onboard deployment without retraining or architectural redesign. Taken together, the three phases show that a well-understood LSTM architecture, with targeted adjustments and post-training compression, can approach competitive detection performance within the memory constraints of real flight hardware.
References
REFERENCES
Goetze, C., Schlippe, T., & Lakey, D. (2026). Deep Learning-Based Anomaly Detection in Spacecraft Telemetry on Edge Devices.
Hundman, K., Constantinou, V., Laporte, C., Colwell, I., & Soderstrom, T. (2018). Detecting Spacecraft Anomalies Using LSTMs and Nonparametric Dynamic Thresholding. Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1145/3219819.3219845
Kotowski, K., Haskamp, C., Andrzejewski, J., Ruszczak, B., Nalepa, J., Lakey, D., Collins, P., Kolmas, A., Bartesaghi, M., Martinez-Heras, J., & De Canio, G. (2024). European Space Agency Benchmark for Anomaly Detection in Satellite Telemetry. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.17826
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 323(6088), 533–536. https://doi.org/10.1038/323533a0
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735–1780. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735
Jalilian, S., & Sabeghi, M. (2013). A survey on Fault Detection, Isolation and Recovery (FDIR) module in satellite onboard software. IEEE Conference on Space Operations (SpaceOps), 1–8. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6581270
Entekhabi, D., Asrar, G. R., Betts, A. K., Beheri, M. A., & NASA SMAP Science Team. (2014). Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Mission Science Data Products. NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory. https://smap.jpl.nasa.gov
Grotzinger, J. P., Crisp, J., Vasavada, A. R., Anderson, R. C., Beegle, L. W., Bleacher, L. V., ... & Wiens, R. C. (2012). Mars Science Laboratory Mission and Science Investigation. Space Science Reviews, 170(1-4), 5–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-012-9892-2
Jacob, B., Kligys, S., Chen, B., Zhu, M., Tang, M., Howard, A., Adam, H., & Kalenichenko, D. (2018). Quantization and Training of Neural Networks for Efficient Integer-Arithmetic-Only Inference. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2704–2713. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2018.00286
Hennessy, J. L., & Patterson, D. A. (2017). Computer Architecture: A Quantitative Approach (6th ed.). Morgan Kaufmann.
Warden, P., & Situnayake, D. (2019). TinyML: Machine Learning with TensorFlow Lite on Arduino and Ultra-Low-Power Microcontrollers. O'Reilly Media.
NASA Ames Research Center. (2014). NASA Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS). NASA Technical Reports Server. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20140000574
Downloads
Posted
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Research Archive of Rising Scholars

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.