Oxygen-dead zone sites’ characteristics analysis and corresponding modified solutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.396Abstract
Oxygen-dead zones, or hypoxic zones, are areas in aquatic ecosystems where dissolved oxygen levels fall below 2 mg/L, resulting in the death or migration of most marine life. Despite their severe environmental and economic consequences, public awareness regarding oxygen-dead zones remains low. This document aims to analyze the characteristics of two global sites severely impacted by oxygen-dead zones, assess their causes and effects, and propose modified solutions to address the issue. The two sites investigated are the Gulf of Mexico and the Chesapeake Bay, both of which exemplify the negative consequences of oxygen-dead zones on marine life, human health, and the economy. This literature review analyzed ongoing efforts to mitigate the effects of oxygen-dead zones and proposes modified solutions based on global best practices. These recommendations include reducing nutrient pollution through better agricultural practices, implementing effective policies and regulations, and promoting public awareness and stakeholder cooperation. By understanding the causes and consequences of oxygen-dead zones and adopting effective solutions, we can work towards preserving aquatic ecosystems, improving public health, and safeguarding economic interests.
References
N. O. and A. A. US Department of Commerce, “What is a dead zone?,”oceanservice.noaa.gov, Jan. 20, 2023.
https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/deadzone.html#:~:text=%22Dead%20zone%22%20is%20a%20more
D. Malmquist, “Dead Zones | Virginia Institute of Marine Science,” Vims.edu, 2019.
https://www.vims.edu/research/topics/dead_zones/index.php
US EPA, “The Effects: Human Health | US EPA,” US EPA, Apr. 18, 2019. https://www.epa.gov/nutrientpollution/effects-human-health
“Nitrate | Cancer Trends Progress Report,” Cancer.gov, 2019. https://progressreport.cancer.gov/prevention/nitrate
EPA, “The Effects: Economy | US EPA,” US EPA, Feb. 13, 2019. https://www.epa.gov/nutrientpollution/effects-economy
US EPA,OW, “The Effects: Environment | US EPA,” US EPA, Apr. 18, 2019. https://www.epa.gov/nutrientpollution/effects-environment
NOAA, Dead zone area in the Gulf of Mexico in 2010. Available: https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/dead-zone/#undefined
“Mississippi,” America’s Heartland. https://www.americasheartland.org/state/mississippi/#:~:text=Cotton%20is%20the%20state
“Mississippi River Gulf of Mexico Watershed Nutrient Task Force.” Available:
https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-03/documents/2008_8_28_msbasin_ghap2008_upd
ate082608.pdf
Communications and Publishing, “Very large dead zone forecast for the Gulf of Mexico | U.S. Geological Survey,” www.usgs.gov, Jun. 10, 2019.
https://www.usgs.gov/news/national-news-release/very-large-dead-zone-forecast-gulf-mexico
(accessed Jul. 13, 2023).
D. Malakoff, “COASTAL ECOLOGY:Death by Suffocation in the Gulf of Mexico,” Science, vol. 281, no. 5374, pp. 190–192, Jul. 1998, doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5374.190.
D. Anair and A. Mahmassani, “Reviving the Dead Zone Solutions to Benefit Both Gulf Coast Fishers and Midwest Farmers,” 2013. Available: https://www.ucsusa.org/sites/default/files/2020-06/reviving-the-dead-zone.pdf
“HTF 2015 Report to Congress,” Aug. 2015. Available: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-10/documents/htf_report_to_congress_final_-_10.1.15.pdf
K. A. Rose, S. Creekmore, P. Thomas, J. K. Craig, M. S. Rahman, and R. M. Neilan, “Modeling the Population Effects of Hypoxia on Atlantic Croaker (Micropogonias undulatus) in the Northwestern Gulf of Mexico: Part 1—Model Description and Idealized Hypoxia,” Estuaries and Coasts, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 233–254, Jun. 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-017-0266-6.14
O. US EPA, “Hypoxia Task Force Action Plans and Goal Framework,” www.epa.gov, Mar. 09, 2015. https://www.epa.gov/ms-htf/hypoxia-task-force-action-plans-and-goal-framework
US EPA,OW, “Mississippi River/Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia Task Force | US EPA,” US EPA, Jun. 06, 2019. https://www.epa.gov/ms-htf
N. O. and A. A. US Department of Commerce, “Happening Now: Dead Zone in the Gulf 2021,” oceantoday.noaa.gov, 2021.
https://oceantoday.noaa.gov/deadzonegulf-2021/welcome.html
“New Jersey-Size ‘Dead Zone’ Is Largest Ever in Gulf of Mexico,” Science, Aug. 02, 2017.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/gulf-mexico-hypoxia-water-quality-dead-zone
“Dead Zones,” www.cbf.org. https://www.cbf.org/issues/dead-zones/index.html#:~:text=Where%20Are%20the%20Dead%20Zones (accessed Jul. 13, 2023).
]S. Vogelsong, V. M. June 18, and 2020, “After a less rainy spring, the Chesapeake Bay may see smaller dead zone than normal,” Virginia Mercury, Jun. 18, 2020.https://www.virginiamercury.com/2020/06/18/after-a-less-rainy-spring-the-chesapeake-bay-maysee-a-smaller-dead-zone-than-normal-this-year/
“2025 Watershed Implementation Plans (WIPs),” Chesapeake Progress.
http://chesapeakeprogress.com/clean-water/water-quality/watershed-implementation-plans
(accessed Jul. 13, 2023).
“Guidance for Federal Land Management in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Chapter 2. Agriculture Chapter 2. Agriculture 2,” 2010. Available: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-10/documents/chesbay_chap02.pdf
“Chesapeake Bay Watershed | NRCS,” Usda.gov, 2018. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detailfull/national/programs/initiatives/?cid=stelprdb1047323
“EPA Establishes Chesapeake Bay ‘Pollution Diet,’” Chesapeake Bay, Dec. 30, 2010.
https://www.chesapeakebay.net/news/blog/epa-establishes-chesapeake-bay-pollution-diet#:~:text=The%20pollution%20diet%2C%20formally%20called (accessed Jul. 13, 2023).
“Agricultural Runoff,” Chesapeake Bay. https://www.chesapeakebay.net/issues/threats-to-the-bay/agricultural-runoff
“BMP Expert Panels,” Chesapeake Bay. https://www.chesapeakebay.net/who/group/bmp_expert_panels (accessed Jul. 13, 2023).
“BMP Verification,” Chesapeake Bay. https://www.chesapeakebay.net/what/programs/bmp_introduction_to_bmp_verification (accessed Jul. 13, 2023).
P. J. A. Kleinman et al., “Phosphorus and the Chesapeake Bay: Lingering Issues and Emerging Concerns for Agriculture,” Journal of Environmental Quality, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1191–1203, Aug. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2019.03.0112.
“Scientific survey shows highest-ever level of spawning-age female crabs,” Virginia Institute of Marine Science. https://www.vims.edu/newsandevents/topstories/2017/wbcds_2017.php (accessed Jul. 13, 2023).
M. M. St. Laurent and P. A. Grecay, "Effects of hypoxia on the distribution, growth, and survival of juvenile bay anchovy Anchoa mitchilli in Chesapeake Bay," Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., vol. 474, pp. 207-219, 2013, doi: 10.3354/meps10087.15
B. J. Smith and J. E. Lyons, "Invertebrate community response to hypoxia in a shallow eutrophic estuary," Estuaries Coast., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 612-624, 2011, doi:10.1007/s12237-011-9385-6.
Downloads
Posted
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Cathy Zhong
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.