Optimizing Vortex Generator Configurations on Commercial Aircraft
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.3923Keywords:
Vortex generators, Commercial Aircraft, AerodynamicsAbstract
This paper discusses the optimal size and geometry of generators on commercial aircraft to prevent stalling while minimizing drag generated by the vortex generators (VG) based on literature review. While VGs equipment is necessary for the airplane’s safety, they inevitably increase skin friction drag on the wing. Although it increases the safety of the aircraft, this added turbulence increases drag and fuel consumption, which increases the budget, especially over long-term operation. This paper will review the results of multiple published research papers, and determine the best outcome by combining the findings throughout different papers. The goal of this paper is to find a VG that can maximize passenger safety by delaying flow separation while minimizing the economic and aerodynamic costs of excess drag. By analyzing numerous aerodynamic principles, this paper investigates how the orientation, height, and geometry of VGs can be optimized and how these devices ensure every passenger’s safety without sacrificing fuel economy. Using the data from the paper, the literature reviewed concluded that the optimization of a vortex generator likely have a Trapezoidal shape counter-rotating VG, height of 0.8-1.0δ, 10-18 degrees of incidence angle, placed at 20% of chord wing/separation region, 2.5h spacing within each pair and 7-8h between each pair of VG. (δ=boundary layer thickness; h=height of VG).
References
Anderson, J. D. (2017). Fundamentals of aerodynamics (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Benson, T. (2021, May 13). Boundary layer. NASA Glenn Research Center. https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/BGP/boundlay.html
Hall, N. (2023, September 11). Drag of a sphere. NASA Glenn Research Center. https://www1.grc.nasa.gov/beginners-guide-to-aeronautics/drag-of-a-sphere/
SKYbrary. (2021, May 25). Form drag. SKYbrary Aviation Safety. https://skybrary.aero/articles/form-drag
Meyer, J., Okfen, P., & Bil, C. (2020). Optimisation of vortex generators for stall speed reduction. Proceedings of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences (ICAS 2020). https://www.icas.org/ICAS_ARCHIVE/ICAS2020/data/papers/ICAS2020_0311_paper.pdf
Lee, S., & Kim, C. (2018). Design optimization of vortex generator array to delay pitch-up on tailless aircraft. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics (ICCFD10). https://www.iccfd.org/iccfd10/papers/ICCFD10-019-Paper.pdf
Godard, G., & Stanislas, M. (2006). Control of a decelerating boundary layer. Part 1: Optimization of passive vortex generators. Aerospace Science and Technology, 10(3), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2005.11.007
Lin, J. C. (2002). Review of research on low-profile vortex generators to control boundary-layer separation. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 38(4–5), 389–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-0421(02)00010-6
Boeing. (2022). Shape-shifting: The future of sustainable flight gets SMART. Boeing. https://www.boeing.com/company/about-bca/washington/shape-shifting
Downloads
Posted
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Research Archive of Rising Scholars

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.