Preprint / Version 1

An Accessible, Low-Cost method for Gait Monitoring with a Raspberry Pi and MPU 6050: Proof of Concept

##article.authors##

  • Snehansh Bachala Rouse High School
  • Morteza Sarmadi MIT Alumni

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.3736

Keywords:

Gait Monitoring, Low-Cost Wearable Device, Raspberry Pi 5

Abstract

Gait deviations are common in aging populations and those with neurological or musculoskeletal disorders, leading to reduced independence and higher healthcare costs. Even though optical motion-capture systems deliver the accuracy necessary for kinematic analysis, the cost associated with it restricts the usage in laboratory settings. We developed a low-cost, wearable gait measuring device that can be held in the hand, utilizing a Raspberry Pi 5 and an MPU6050 IMU. The system recorded six motion features from an inertial measurement unit and compared walking trials against a user-specific baseline using a Euclidean distance metric. Unlike camera-based or smartphone-dependent systems, our proposed device operates independently of external infrastructure and is designed to support patient-specific calibration using minimal computational resources. We hypothesized that gyroscope-based motion features would be more sensitive than accelerometer features for distinguishing deviations from normal gait. The tool has the potential to enhance remote gait monitoring, rehabilitation, as well as the early detection of conditions of gait abnormalities, thus improving the quality of life for patients suffering from gait disorders. Preliminary testing using simulated gait conditions demonstrated greater variability in gyroscopic features compared to accelerometer features, with correct classification in approximately 75% of tested conditions across multiple simulated gait scenarios.

References

Castillo, B., et al. “Assessing

Spatiotemporal Behavior of Human Gait: A Comparative Study

between Low-Cost Smartphone-Based Mocap and OptiTrack Systems.” Experimental Techniques, Springer Science+Business Media, May 2024, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-024-00716-x.

Collins, Francis S., and Harold Varmus. “A New Initiative on Precision Medicine.” New England

Journal of Medicine, vol. 372, no. 9, Feb. 2015, pp. 793–95, https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp1500523.

Fuller, Daniel, et al. “Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for

Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: Systematic Review.” JMIR MHealth and UHealth, vol. 8, no. 9, 2020, p. e18694, https://doi.org/10.2196/18694.

Howell, David R., et al. “Determining the Utility of a Smartphone-Based Gait Evaluation for

Possible Use in Concussion Management.” The Physician and Sportsmedicine, vol. 48, no. 1, June 2019, pp. 75–80, https://doi.org/10.1080/00913847.2019.1632155. Accessed 7 July 2021.

Hutabarat, Yonatan, et al. “IEEE Xplore Full-Text PDF”: Ieee.org, 2025,

ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=9568979. Accessed 7 Sept. 2025.

Mason, Rachel, et al. “Wearables for Running Gait Analysis: A Systematic Review.” Sports

Medicine, vol. 53, no. 1, Oct. 2022, pp. 241–68, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01760-6.

Mazurek, Kevin A., et al. “A Validation Study Demonstrating Portable Motion Capture Cameras

Accurately Characterize Gait Metrics When Compared to a Pressure-Sensitive Walkway.” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, no. 1, 2024, p. 17464, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-68402-x.

Muro-de-la-Herran, Alvaro, et al. “Gait Analysis Methods: An Overview of Wearable and

Non-Wearable Systems, Highlighting Clinical Applications.” Sensors, vol. 14, no. 2, Feb. 2014, pp. 3362–94, https://doi.org/10.3390/s140203362.

Park, Heesu, et al. “Classification of Gait Phases Based on a Machine Learning Approach Using

Muscle Synergy.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 17, Frontiers Media, May 2023, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1201935.

Pirker, Walter, and Regina Katzenschlager. “Gait disorders in adults and the elderly : A clinical

guide.” Wiener klinische Wochenschrift vol. 129,3-4 (2017): 81-95. doi:10.1007/s00508-016-1096-4

Schapira, Anthony H. V., et al. “Glucocerebrosidase in Parkinson’s Disease: Insights into

Pathogenesis and Prospects for Treatment.” Movement Disorders, vol. 31, no. 6, Apr. 2016, pp. 830–35, https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.26616. Accessed 23 Jan. 2020.

Wang, Xiaoming, et al. “Wearable Sensors for Activity Monitoring and Motion Control: A

Review.” Biomimetic Intelligence and Robotics, vol. 3, no. 1, Feb. 2023, p. 100089, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.birob.2023.100089.

World Health Organization. “World Report on Disability.” Www.who.int, 2011, www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241564182.

Downloads

Posted

2026-04-10

Categories