Preprint / Version 1

Legislation Outpaced by Innovation: An Analysis of the United States’ Commercial Space Sector

##article.authors##

  • Paulina Huang Basis Independent Mclean

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.356

Keywords:

Space policy, Space law, American policy, Public policy, Commercial space, Private space, International law

Abstract

The private space sector has emerged in the United States in recent years, with companies like SpaceX, Blue Origin, and Virgin Galactic making orbit and contributing to space innovation. The expansion of such an industry in a field that people have traditionally viewed as government domain raises questions about how these privately owned and operated companies interact with United States and International space law.

This paper will explore how these companies must adhere to, or are able to avoid, the laws that govern both national and international space activity. By examining existing United Nations (UN) space treaties and the United States’ own legal framework for space ventures, this paper identifies to what extent private space companies must follow these guidelines. This paper will also examine diplomatic limits of these actors and whether or not they are required to act in alignment with their “home country.” In other words, are these private corporations merely privately funded extensions of the United States’ federal space sector? If not, to what extent are they independent of government interests?

In answering these questions, this paper takes into account current developments in the commercial space sector, such as new technology and current space events, that may be a source of international tension. Unveiling federal deregulation as a primary cause of the private space sector’s rapid growth reveals how excessive power and freedom without proper regulation in such a vast field of study, both literally and figuratively, can potentially pave the way for international disaster.

References

Blue Origin. (n.d.). Blue Moon. Blue Origin. Retrieved July 3, 2023, from https://www.blueorigin.com/blue-moon

Commercial Space Launch Act, 49 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq. (1984). https://www.congress.gov/bill/98th-congress/house-bill/3942/text

Communications Satellite Act, 47 U.S.C. § 609 et seq. (1964).

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-76/pdf/STATUTE-76-Pg419.pdf#page=1

Cornell Law School. (n.d.). colonialism. Legal Information Institute. Retrieved July 7, 2023, from https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/colonialism

Davenport, C. (2023, March 8). Satellite technology raises new issues for American military. The Washington Post. Retrieved July 9, 2023, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/03/08/ukraine-russia-satellite-space-force-policy/

Federal Aviation Administration. (n.d.). Home About FAA Offices About the Office of Commercial Space Transportation. Federal Aviation Administration. Retrieved June 23, 2023, from https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast

Fryhoff, D. M. (2020). The Revolution of the Commercial Space Industry: Why Current Laws Must be Replaced Before American Business Expands to the Moon and Beyond. Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial, & Commercial Law, 15(1), 237-61. Retrieved June 23, 2023, from https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1347&context=bjcfcl

Goguichvili, S., Linenberger, A., & Gillette, A. (2021, October 1). The Global Legal Landscape of Space: Who Writes the Rules on the Final Frontier? Wilson Center. Retrieved June 21, 2023, from https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/global-legal-landscape-space-who-writes-rules-final-frontier

Kramer, M. (2022, November 1). Satellites like Elon Musl's Starlink are the next front in space war. Axios. Retrieved July 9, 2023, from https://www.axios.com/2022/11/01/starlink-ukraine-elon-musk-war-space

NASA. (2020). Guidebook for Proposers Responding to a NASA Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO). National Aeronautic and Space Administration, 1-54. Retrieved June 28, 2023, from https://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/procurement/nraguidebook/proposer2020.pdf

Singer, P. (1996). Ethics and the Limits of Scientific Freedom. The Monist, 79(2), 218-29. JSTOR. Retrieved July 7, 2023, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27903475

SpaceX. (n.d.). Starship. SpaceX. Retrieved July 5, 2023, from https://www.spacex.com/vehicles/starship/

Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, December 19, 1966. https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ast/media/treaty_Princi_Gov_Acti_States_OST.pdf

U.S. Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act, 51 U.S.C. § 10101 et seq. (2015). https://www.congress.gov/114/plaws/publ90/PLAW-114publ90.pdf

U.S. Department of State [DOS]. (2023). Artemis Accords. U.S. Department of State. Retrieved June 25, 2023, from https://www.state.gov/artemis-accords/

Wattles, J. (2020, September 8). Elon Musk wants to colonize Mars. Is that profitable? CNN. Retrieved July 7, 2023, from https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/08/tech/spacex-mars-profit-scn/index.html

Downloads

Posted

2023-08-19