Optimizing Gefitinib for Toxicity Reduction and Dual-Route Administration: A Structure–Property–Toxicity Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.3302Keywords:
Gefitinib, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), Structure–property–toxicity relationshipAbstract
Gefitinib is a first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) used to treat non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutation. By binding competitively and reversibly to the ATP-binding pocket of the EGFR tyrosine kinase domain, gefitinib can block phosphorylation and downstream signal pathway.
Due to its high membrane permeability but poor aqueous solubility, gefitinib is administered orally only. However, oral delivery requires the drug to go through the first-pass metabolism, which can form toxic reactive intermediates that contribute to hepatocellular injury by the oxidation process performed by liver enzymes like CYP2D6 and CYP3A4.
Given these concerns, this study aimed to reduce hepatotoxicity, improve solubility, and explore the potential for dual-route administration (oral and intravenous) by designing five derivatives of gefitinib.
Our findings showed that all derivatives successfully reduced hepatotoxicity from active to inactive status and had significant reductions in LogP values. We propose that derivative 2 is the best candidate in these five derivatives. It demonstrates a favorable LogP (2.91), strong EGFR binding affinity (-8.76 kcal/mol), more polar interactions, and reduced toxicities. However, derivative 3 achieves significant reductions in hepatotoxicity, specifically, and has the least number of active toxicity endpoints. It can only be considered as a capable future research target as it exhibits lower LD50 value, indicating higher acute toxicity, and has a LogP value of 1.08, which may be too soluble for oral drugs.
These findings provide a computational basis for the development of gefitinib with improved pharmacological profiles. Still, we strongly recommend further experiments and clinical trials to validate the efficacy and safety of these five novel derivatives.
References
Alduais Y, Zhang H, Fan F, Chen J, Chen B. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A review
of risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Feb 22;102(8):e32899.
Molina JR, Yang P, Cassivi SD, Schild SE, Adjei AA. Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Treatment, and Survivorship. Mayo Clin Proc Mayo Clin. 2008 May;83(5):584–94.
Testa U, Castelli G, Pelosi E. Lung Cancers: Molecular Characterization, Clonal Heterogeneity and Evolution, and Cancer Stem Cells. Cancers. 2018 Aug;10(8):248.
Rosell R, Moran T, Queralt C, Porta R, Cardenal F, Camps C, et al. Screening for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009 Sept 3;361(10):958–67.
Bahar ME, Kim HJ, Kim DR. Targeting the RAS/RAF/MAPK pathway for cancer therapy: from mechanism to clinical studies. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023 Dec 18;8(1):455.
Cohen MH, Williams GA, Sridhara R, Chen G, Pazdur R. FDA drug approval summary: gefitinib (ZD1839) (Iressa) tablets. The Oncologist. 2003;8(4):303–6.
Kazandjian D, Blumenthal GM, Yuan W, He K, Keegan P, Pazdur R. FDA Approval of Gefitinib for the Treatment of Patients with Metastatic EGFR Mutation–Positive Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Mar 14;22(6):1307–12.
Thomas P, Vincent B, George C, Joshua JM, Pavithran K, Vijayan M. A comparative study on erlotinib & gefitinib therapy in non-small cell lung carcinoma patients. Indian J Med Res. 2019 July;150(1):67–72.
Takeda M, Okamoto I, Nakagawa K. Pooled safety analysis of EGFR-TKI treatment for EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2015 Apr 1;88(1):74–9.
Wang J, Wu Y, Dong M, He X, Wang Z, Li J, et al. Observation of hepatotoxicity during long- term gefitinib administration in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Anticancer Drugs. 2016 Mar;27(3):245.
Li M, Peng S, Bu J, Quan S, Liu L, Yue Z, et al. Glycyrrhizic acid alleviates gefitinib-induced liver injury by regulating the p53/p21 pathway and releasing cell cycle arrest. Food Chem Toxicol. 2025 June 1;200:115405.
Banerjee P, Kemmler E, Dunkel M, Preissner R. ProTox 3.0: a webserver for the prediction of toxicity of chemicals. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024 July 5;52(W1):W513–20.
Kim S, Chen J, Cheng T, Gindulyte A, He J, He S, et al. PubChem 2025 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025 Jan 6;53(D1):D1516–25.
Schrödinger, LLC. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.8. 2015.
Burley SK, Bhatt R, Bhikadiya C, Bi C, Biester A, Biswas P, et al. Updated resources for exploring experimentally-determined PDB structures and Computed Structure Models at the RCSB Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025 Jan 6;53(D1):D564–74.
Guex N, Peitsch MC. SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling. Electrophoresis. 1997 Dec;18(15):2714–23.
Morris GM, Huey R, Lindstrom W, Sanner MF, Belew RK, Goodsell DS, et al. AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated Docking with Selective Receptor Flexibility. J Comput Chem. 2009 Dec;30(16):2785–91.
Eberhardt J, Santos-Martins D, Tillack AF, Forli S. AutoDock Vina 1.2.0: New Docking Methods, Expanded Force Field, and Python Bindings. J Chem Inf Model. 2021 Aug 23;61(8):3891–8.
Lynch T, Price A. The Effect of Cytochrome P450 Metabolism on Drug Response, Interactions, and Adverse Effects. Am Fam Physician. 2007 Aug 1;76(3):391–6.
John R. Horn P, Philip D. Hansten P. Drug Interactions with CYP3A4: An Update. 2015 Dec 16 [cited 2025 July 14];81. Available from: https://www.pharmacytimes.com/view/drug- interactions-with-cyp3a4-an-update
Guan S, Chen X, Huang M, Zhang L, Wang X. Correlation of gefitinib and its metabolites with gefitinib induced rash in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 20;38(15_suppl):e21712–e21712.
Zhao M, Ma J, Li M, Zhang Y, Jiang B, Zhao X, et al. Cytochrome P450 Enzymes and Drug Metabolism in Humans. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Nov 26;22(23):12808.
Lane TR, Harris J, Urbina F, Ekins S. Comparing LD50/LC50 Machine Learning Models for Multiple Species. J Chem Health Saf. 2023 Mar 27;30(2):83–97.
Government of Canada CC for OH and S. CCOHS: What is a LD50 and LC50? [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 July 15]. Available from: https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/chemicals/ld50.html
Rn) OR for N (Open, Ernstmeyer K, Christman E. Chapter 2 Administer IV Push Medications. In: Nursing Advanced Skills [Internet] [Internet]. Chippewa Valley Technical College; 2023 [cited 2025 July 16]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK594489/
Alsedfy MY, Ebnalwaled AA, Moustafa M, Said AH. Investigating the binding affinity, molecular dynamics, and ADMET properties of curcumin-IONPs as a mucoadhesive bioavailable oral treatment for iron deficiency anemia. Sci Rep. 2024 Sept 25;14:22027.
Yun CH, Boggon TJ, Li Y, Woo MS, Greulich H, Meyerson M, et al. Structures of Lung Cancer-Derived EGFR Mutants and Inhibitor Complexes: Mechanism of Activation and Insights into Differential Inhibitor Sensitivity. Cancer Cell. 2007 Mar 13;11(3):217–27.
Mobley DL, Dill KA. Binding of Small-Molecule Ligands to Proteins: “What You See” Is Not Always “What You Get.” Struct Lond Engl 1993. 2009 Apr 15;17(4):489–98.
Velmourougane G. Understanding Lipinski’s Rule of 5 and the Role of LogP Value in Drug Design and Development | [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 July 15]. Available from: https://www.sailife.com/understanding-lipinskis-rule-of-5-and-the-role-of-LogP-value-in-drug- design-and-development/
Kim J, De Jesus O. Medication Routes of Administration. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 [cited 2025 July 15]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK568677/
Keshari AC, Thitame SN, Aher AA, Keshari UC. Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Mechanisms, Diagnosis, and Management: A Review. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 May;17(Suppl 1):S55.
Molloy B, Mullin L, King A, Gethings LA, Plumb RS, Wilson ID. The Pharmacometabodynamics of Gefitinib after Intravenous Administration to Mice: A Preliminary UPLC–IM–MS Study. Metabolites. 2021 June;11(6):379.
Plumb RS, Gethings LA, Isaac G, Munjoma NC, Wilson ID. Detection of pharmacolipidodynamic effects following the intravenous and oral administration of gefitinib to C57Bl/6JRj mice by rapid UHPLC-MS analysis of plasma. Sci Rep. 2024 July 24;14(1):17061.
Downloads
Posted
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Lehan Gu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.