Understanding Music in the Brain: Neural Processing, Training, and Cultural Contexts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.3214Keywords:
Music perception, Neural Processing, Auditory cognitionAbstract
Music, characterized by structural components such as pitch, rhythm, and tonality, is
processed within the brain in ways that raise fundamental questions about universality and
cultural specificity. Some researchers hold that music processing is universal, with the reason
being that all humans use the same neural machinery for processing rhythm, pitch, and general
musical structure. Others note that musical perception and interpretation are moderated by
experience and exposure. This disagreement raises a basic question: is music perception best
explained by universal neural mechanisms or by training and cultural familiarity? This paper
presents examples from EEG studies to exemplify how neural activity mirrors early sensory and
higher-level aspects of auditory coding. Such research demonstrates that trained musicians
tend to show more accurate neural encoding for musical features such as pitch and timing and
how, even without formal training, individuals exposed to music from their own culture and to
foreign music can still discriminate between these tonal patterns much more efficiently. In
addition, cross-cultural data show that experience with language and daily rhythmic entrainment
contribute to the development of auditory skills as well, demonstrating how understanding music
cannot be reduced to practice alone. Taken together, these findings discredit the notion of an
entirely universal perception of music; while most humans perceive music itself, both cultural
convention and the degree of individual training determine the depth and richness of music
perception. The integration of neural composition, auditory exposure, and socio-cultural
surroundings furnishes a more unified theory of music processing and understanding,
highlighting the necessity to embrace biological, experiential, and cultural elements in music
perception studies.
References
Arthanarieaswaran, S. P., Sahayaraj, P. N., Chelliah, P. S. E., Neelamegarajan, D., Ravirose, U.,
& Karupaiah, K. (2024). Relationship between differential auditory sensitivity and central
auditory processing among musicians and nonmusicians. The Egypt J Otolaryngol 40, 87
(2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-024-00629-x
Bidelman, G. M., Hutka, S., & Moreno, S. (2013). Tone language speakers and musicians share
Enhanced perceptual and cognitive abilities for musical pitch: Evidence for bidirectionality
between the domains of language and music. PLoS ONE, 8(4), e60676.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060676
Coffey, E. B., Herholz, S. C., Chepesiuk, A. M. P., Baillet, S., & Zatorre, R. J. (2016). Cortical
contributions to the auditory frequency-following response revealed by MEG. Nature
Communications, 7, 11070. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11070
Coffey, E. B., Musacchia, G., & Zatorre, R. J. (2017). Cortical correlates of the frequencyfollowing and onset responses: Evidence for contributions of the auditory cortex to the
FFR. The Journal of Neuroscience, 37(21), 5218–5228.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1265-16.2016
Cross, I. (2006). Music, cognition, culture, and evolution. Annals of the New York Academy of
Sciences, 930(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb05723.x
Humphries, C., Liebenthal, E., & Binder, J. R. (2010). Tonotopic organization of the human
auditory cortex. NeuroImage, 50(3), 1202–1211.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.046
Koelsch, S. (2014). Brain correlates of music-evoked emotions. Nature Reviews Neuroscience,
(3), 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3666
Mankel, K., & Bidelman, G. M. (2018). Inherent auditory skills rather than formal music
Training shapes the neural encoding of speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences, 115(51), 13129–13134. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1811793115
Mehr, S. A., Singh, M., Knox, D., Ketter, D. M., Pickens-Jones, D., Atwood, S., Lucas, C.,
Jacoby, N., & Egner, A. A. (2019). Universality and diversity in human song. Science,
(6468), eaax0868. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax0868
Morrison, S. J., & Demorest, S. M. (2009). Cultural constraints on music perception and
cognition. Progress in Brain Research, 178, 67–77.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17805-6
Patel, A. D., & Iversen, J. R. (2014). The evolutionary neuroscience of musical beat perception:
The action simulation for auditory prediction (ASAP) hypothesis. Frontiers in Systems
Neuroscience, 7, 56. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00057
Tierney, A., & Kraus, N. (2013). The ability to move to a beat is linked to the consistency of
neural responses to sound. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(38), 14981–14988.
https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0612-13.2013
Thompson, W. F., Graham, P., & Russo, F. A. (2005). Seeing music performance: Visual
influences on perception and experience. Semiotica, 156(1),
–227.https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2005.2005.156.203
Wong, P. C., Skoe, E., Russo, N. M., Dees, T., & Kraus, N. (2007). Musical experience shapes
human brainstem encoding linguistic pitch patterns. Nature Neuroscience, 10(4),
Downloads
Posted
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Cyrus Gandhi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.