Teaching for Transformation: The Impact of Instructional Methods and Teacher-Student Relationships on Early Adolescent Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.3197Abstract
Early adolescence, spanning ages 10 to 14, is a period marked by rapid cognitive, emotional, and social development. During this time, school becomes a central environment in adolescents' lives, where they spend much of their day and encounter key opportunities for growth. This paper explores how teaching styles and teacher-student relationships (TSRs) influence youth development during this formative stage. Four different instructional approaches are examined on the basis of how they meet different educational goals and developmental needs. . This paper also analyzes how these teaching styles are applied across public, private, and Montessori school settings, showing how institutional structures, class size, and educational philosophy shape instructional methods. Central to all effective teaching, however, are strong teacher-student relationships. Grounded in trust, emotional support, and high expectations, TSRs foster student motivation, engagement, and resilience, particularly among vulnerable students. Drawing upon literature in developmental neuroscience and educational psychology, research shows that emotionally supportive teaching can buffer stress, improve behavior, and promote academic success. Ultimately, this review argues that effective education for early adolescents depends not only on adapting teaching methods to meet developmental needs, but also on building caring, responsive relationships that help students thrive. By blending structured instruction with autonomy-supportive practices and prioritizing relational pedagogy, educators can foster academic achievement, social-emotional growth, and long-term student well-being during this pivotal stage of life. These findings can guide teachers, school leaders, and policymakers in creating developmentally responsive classrooms that better support early adolescents’ diverse needs and promote lasting educational success.
References
Ahmad, S., & Reba, A. (2018). Impact of Montessori education on academic achievement and social development. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v5i1.1552
Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021017
Allen, J. P., Gregory, A., Mikami, A. Y., Lun, J., Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2013). Observations of effective teacher–student interactions in secondary school classrooms: Predicting student achievement with the Classroom Assessment Scoring System–Secondary. School Psychology Review, 42(1), 76–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2013.12087492
Al-Yaaribi, A. S., Aldhafri, S., Alkharusi, H., & Al-Harthy, I. (2019). Measuring student–teacher relationships in Oman: Adaptation and validation of the STRM. Journal of Educational and Psychological Studies, 13(3), 429–442.
Ang, R. P., Li, X., & Liang, L. (2020). Teacher–student relationship inventory (student version): Psychometric properties with Chinese students. Educational Psychology, 40(7), 819–832. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1649176
Archer, A. L., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. Guilford Press.
Baker, J. A. (2006). Contributions of teacher–child relationships to positive school adjustment during elementary school. Journal of School Psychology, 44(3), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.02.002
Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Teaching for meaningful learning: A review of research on inquiry-based and cooperative learning. In L. Darling-Hammond, B. Barron, P. Pearson, A. Schoenfeld, E. Stage, T. Zimmerman, G. Cervetti, & J. Tilson (Eds.), Powerful learning: What we know about teaching for understanding (pp. 11–70). Jossey-Bass.
Berenbaum, S. A., Beltz, A. M., & Corley, R. (2015). The importance of puberty for adolescent development: Conceptualization and measurement. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 48, 53–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acdb.2014.11.002
Blakemore, S.-J., Burnett, S., & Dahl, R. E. (2010). The role of puberty in the developing adolescent brain. Human Brain Mapping, 31(6), 926–933. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21052
Blakemore, S.-J., & Choudhury, S. (2006). Development of the adolescent brain: Implications for executive function and social cognition. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(3-4), 296–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01611.x
Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21–32.
Cardenal, M. E., Díaz-Santana, P., & González-Betancor, S. M. (2024). Teacher–student relationships and inclusive practices in secondary schools: Pathways to equity. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(2), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2022.2142935
Choy, S. P. (1997). Findings from The Condition of Education 1997: Public and private school comparison. National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs97/97982.pdf
Claro, S., Paunesku, D., & Dweck, C. S. (2016). Growth mindset tempers the effects of poverty on academic achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(31), 8664–8668. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1608207113
Dohrmann, K. R., Nishida, T. K., Gartner, A., Lipsky, D. K., & Grimm, K. J. (2007). High school outcomes for students in a public Montessori program. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 22(2), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568540709594622
Downer, J. T., Sabol, T. J., & Hamre, B. K. (2015). Teacher–child interactions in the classroom: Toward a theory of within- and cross-domain links to children’s developmental outcomes. Early Education and Development, 26(2), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2015.991603
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & Mac Iver, D. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage–environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48(2), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.2.90
Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2011). Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00725.x
Enger, S. K. (2016). The impact of inquiry-based science instruction on elementary students’ science content knowledge and attitudes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(6), 1019–1031. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9630-3
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Gay, G. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Gersten, R., Compton, D., Connor, C. M., Dimino, J., Santoro, L., Linan-Thompson, S., & Tilly, W. D. (2009). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to intervention and multi-tier intervention in the primary grades. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3
Gormally, C., Brickman, P., Hallar, B., & Armstrong, N. (2009). Effects of inquiry-based learning on students’ science literacy skills and confidence. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(2), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030216
Grasha, A. F. (1996). Teaching with style: A practical guide to enhancing learning by understanding teaching and learning styles. Alliance Publishers.
Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Early teacher–child relationships and the trajectory of children’s school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72(2), 625–638. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00301
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368
Ingersoll, R. M. (2007). Short on power, long on responsibility. Educational Leadership, 65(1), 20–25.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(4), 85–118.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
Lewis, G. J., Haworth, C. M., & Plomin, R. (2013). Identical genetic influences underpin behavior problems in adolescence and adulthood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54(12), 1320–1328. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12101
Lillard, A. S. (2005). Montessori: The science behind the genius. Oxford University Press.
Lillard, A. S. (2017). Montessori: The science behind the genius (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Lillard, A. S. (2019). Shunned and admired: Montessori, self-determination, and a case for radical school reform. Educational Psychology Review, 31(4), 939–965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09483-3
Lillard, A. S., & Else-Quest, N. (2006). Evaluating Montessori education. Science, 313(5795), 1893–1894. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1132362
Lubienski, C., & Lubienski, S. T. (2006). Charter, private, public schools and academic achievement: New evidence from NAEP mathematics data. National Center For The Study Of Privatization In Education.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Montessori, M. (1964). The Montessori method. Schocken Books. (Original work published 1912)
Murray, C., & Malmgren, K. (2005). Implementing a teacher–student relationship program in high-poverty urban schools: Effects on social, emotional, and academic adjustment. School Psychology Review, 34(2), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2005.12086284
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). How people learn II: Learners, contexts, and cultures. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24783
National Center for Education Statistics. (2023). Digest of education statistics. U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/
O’Connor, E., Collins, B. A., & Supplee, L. (2011). Behavior problems in late childhood: The roles of early maternal attachment and teacher–child relationship trajectories. Attachment & Human Development, 14(3), 265–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2012.672280
Pianta, R. C. (2001). Student–Teacher Relationship Scale: Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Teacher–student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 365–386). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_17
Pfeifer, J. H., Allen, N. B., Byrne, M. L., Mills, K. L., Chen, Z., & Blakemore, S.-J. (2020). Adolescent development and the brain. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(5), 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00038-2
Randolph, C., Prescott, J. E., & Cochrane, A. (2023). A systematic review of Montessori education outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 93(3), 401–437. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231157012
Rathunde, K., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2005). Middle school students’ motivation and quality of experience: A comparison of Montessori and traditional school environments. American Journal of Education, 111(3), 341–371. https://doi.org/10.1086/428885
Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493–529. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311421793
Rosenshine, B. (2012). Principles of instruction: Research-based strategies that all teachers should know. American Educator, 36(1), 12–19.
Rowan, B., Correnti, R., & Miller, R. J. (2002). What large-scale, survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement: Insights from the prospects study of elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 104(8), 1525–1567. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.00212
Salokangas, M., & Wermke, W. (2020). Teachers’ autonomy deconstructed: Irish and Swedish teachers’ perceptions of decision-making and control. European Educational Research Journal, 19(4), 301–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904119880505
Sanders, J. (2024). Building belonging: Teacher–student relationships and equity in secondary schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 134, 104261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104261
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2014). Teacher self-efficacy and perceived autonomy: Relations with teacher engagement, job satisfaction, and emotional exhaustion. Psychological Reports, 114(1), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.2466/14.02.PR0.114k14w0
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Slavin, R. E. (2014). Cooperative learning and academic achievement: Why does groupwork work? Annals of Psychology, 30(3), 785–791. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.201201
Steinberg, L. (2010). A dual systems model of adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Psychobiology, 52(3), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.20445
Stockard, J., Wood, T. W., Coughlin, C., & Khoury, C. R. (2018). The effectiveness of direct instruction curricula: A meta-analysis of a half century of research. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 479–507. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317751919
Swanson, H. L., & Hoskyn, M. (1998). Experimental intervention research on students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 277–321. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003277
Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In J. P. Mestre & B. H. Ross (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation(Vol. 55, pp. 37–76). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12
Additional Files
Posted
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Audrey Park
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.