Preprint / Version 1

Justice on Trial: The Broken Foundations of the Courts of America

##article.authors##

  • Nandana Iyer Polygence

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.3185

Keywords:

judicial ethics, due process, wrongful convictions

Abstract

This paper explores the ethical, legal, and societal consequences of bypassing judicial procedures in the pursuit of criminal convictions. It examines whether securing a conviction at the cost of due process supports or undermines the core principles of justice. Using landmark cases like Williams v. Pennsylvania and Liteky v. United States, the paper highlights how violations of judicial ethics—such as failing to recuse or showing bias—can lead to wrongful convictions and damage public trust in the legal system. Beyond individual cases, these failures point to broader risks, including systemic abuses of power and weakened accountability. The analysis ultimately argues that due process is not a formality, but a fundamental safeguard that ensures fairness, protects rights, and upholds the rule of law.

References

Liteky et al. v. United States. VLEX, 1 Jan. 2025, https://case-law.vlex.com/vid/liteky-et-v-united-889422623.

Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540 (1994). Justia Supreme Court, 1 Jan. 2025, https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/510/540/.

Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540 (1994). Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School, 25 July 2016, https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/92-6921.ZO.html.

Williams v. Pennsylvania. Oyez, 29 Feb. 2016, https://www.oyez.org/cases/2015/15-5040.

U.S. Supreme Court. Liteky et al. v. United States. Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School, 25 July 2016, https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/510/540.

Liteky v. United States. Casetext, https://casetext.com/case/liteky-v-united-states/analysis?citingPage=1&sort=relevance.

Liteky v. United States. CourtListener, https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/112935/liteky-v-united-states/summaries/?page=463.

Williams v. Pennsylvania, 136 S. Ct. 1899 (2016). Casetext, https://casetext.com/case/williams-v-pennsylvania-11/analysis?citingPage=1&sort=relevance.

Williams v. Pennsylvania. Constitutional Accountability Center, https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/williams-v-pennsylvania-u-s-sup-ct/.

"Liteky v. United States: The Supreme Court Restricts The Judicial Bias Exception." University of Richmond Law Review, https://scholarship.richmond.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2114&context=lawreview.

"Williams v. Pennsylvania: The Intolerable Image of Judicial Bias." Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, https://lawecommons.luc.edu/luclj/vol49/iss1/7/.

"Judicial Recusal at the Court." University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online, https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1069&context=penn_law_review_online.

"Judicial Disqualification: An Analysis of Federal Law, Third Edition." U.S. Government Publishing Office, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-JU13-PURL-gpo195239/pdf/GOVPUB-JU13-PURL-gpo195239.pdf.

"Non-Brady Legal and Ethical Obligations on Prosecutors to Disclose Exculpatory Evidence." University of Michigan Law, https://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Documents/NRE_Exculpatory_Evidence_Obligations_for_Prosecutors.pdf.

"Prosecutorial Integrity - Transforming the System." Transforming the System, https://transformingthesystem.org/pdfs/CJReport-Integrity.pdf.

"Prosecution Strategies for Avoiding Racially Biased Convictions." USC Gould School of Law, https://gould.usc.edu/why/students/orgs/ilj/assets/docs/32-3-Bowman.pdf.

"A Policy Proposal to Reduce Unconscious Bias in the Criminal Justice System." Behavioral Policy, https://behavioralpolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/BSP_vol1is2_-Sah.pdf.

"Reducing Racial Bias Through Screening, Compassion, and Procedural Justice." Boston University, https://www.bu.edu/pilj/files/2022/05/REVISED-3-Morris-for-Submission.pdf.

"Williams v. Pennsylvania: Strengthening Judicial Recusal Standards." CaseMine Commentary, https://www.casemine.com/commentary/us/williams-v.-pennsylvania:-strengthening-judicial-recusal-standards-for-former-prosecutors-under-due-process/view.

"Protecting Fair and Impartial Courts: Reflections on Judicial Independence." Judicature, https://judicature.duke.edu/articles/protecting-fair-and-impartial-courts-reflections-on-judicial-independence/.

"Providing Justice - United States Courts." United States Courts, https://www.uscourts.gov/data-news/reports/strategic-planning/strategic-plan-federal-judiciary/issue-1-providing-justice.

"Judicial Immunities Promote Fair and Impartial Judgments." UNODC, https://www.unodc.org/dohadeclaration/en/news/2020/03/judicial-immunities-promote-fair-and-impartial-judgments.html.

"Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary." Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/basic-principles-independence-judiciary.

"Strategies for Avoiding Conflicts of Interest." Brown & James Law Firm, https://brownjames.com/news/strategies-for-avoiding-conflicts-of-interest/.

"Code of Conduct for United States Judges." United States Courts, https://www.uscourts.gov/administration-policies/judiciary-policies/ethics-policies/code-conduct-united-states-judges.

"Judicial Ethics & Recusal." Brennan Center for Justice, https://www.brennancenter.org/issues/strengthen-our-courts/promote-fair-courts/judicial-ethics-recusal.

"Recuse." Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School, https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/recuse.

"Rule 2.11: Disqualification." American Bar Association, https://www.americanbar.org/groups/professional_responsibility/publications/model_code_of_judicial_conduct/model_code_of_judicial_conduct_canon_2/rule2_11disqualification/.

"28 U.S. Code § 455 - Disqualification of Justice, Judge, or Magistrate." Legal Information Institute, Cornell Law School, https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/455.

"To Recuse or Not to Recuse?" Texas District & County Attorneys Association, https://www.tdcaa.com/journal/to-recuse-or-not-to-recuse/.

"Getting Explicit About Implicit Bias." Judicature, Duke University, https://judicature.duke.edu/articles/getting-explicit-about-implicit-bias/.

"Standard 10.20. Court's Duty to Prevent Bias." Judicial Branch of California, https://courts.ca.gov/cms/rules/index/standards/standard10_20.

"Fair Trial & Public Discourse." American Bar Association, https://www.americanbar.org/groups/criminal_justice/resources/standards/fair-trial-public-discourse/.

"The Right to a Fair Trial." Fair Trials International, https://www.fairtrials.org/the-right-to-a-fair-trial/.

"Prosecution Function." American Bar Association, https://www.americanbar.org/groups/criminal_justice/resources/standards/prosecution-function/.

"Fair and Prompt Trial." Rule of Law Education Centre, https://www.ruleoflaw.org.au/principles/fair-and-prompt-trial/.

"The Race to the Top to Reduce Prosecutorial Misconduct." Fordham Law Review, https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5799&context=flr.

Additional Files

Posted

2025-10-05