The Role of Similarity in Forming and Sustaining Interpersonal Relationships: A Survey Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.3086Keywords:
perceived similarity, relationship closeness, conflict frequency, similarity-attraction principle, romantic and platonic tiesAbstract
This study investigates how perceived similarity influences the development of platonic and romantic relationships. Survey questionnaires were digitally administered to 183 participants recruited through Qualtrics and measured similarity in values, daily routines, and worldviews, as well as the frequency of conflict due to differences. Results indicated that participants consider shared values and interests as the dominant factors in friendship formation, while factors such as personality and time spent together were considered as dominant factors in maintaining relationships. One-way ANOVA tests revealed significant differences in worldview similarity, routine similarity, and conflict frequency across groups defined by past experiences with dissimilar romantic partners. Subsequent post hoc Tukey HSD comparisons showed that participants who reported preferring similar partners perceived significantly greater similarity and less frequent conflict compared to those who had experienced unresolved value differences. These results support the similarity-attraction principle but also signify that the extent of dissimilarity lies in how the differences are managed. Overall, the results suggest that while similarity facilitates communication and stability, unresolved differences can undermine closeness, whereas differences addressed constructively do not weaken relationships.
References
Umberson, D., & Montez, J. K. (2010). Social relationships and health: A flashpoint for health policy. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51(1_suppl), S54–S66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510383501
Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. Academic Press.
Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25(6), 889–922. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407508096700
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
Morry, M. M., & Kito, M. (2009). Relational consequences of similarity in values and personality: A longitudinal study of dating couples. Personal Relationships, 16(2), 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01220.x
Montoya, R. M., & Horton, R. S. (2013). A meta-analytic investigation of the processes underlying the similarity–attraction effect. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(1), 64–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512452989
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2, Pt. 2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025848
Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (1996). Self and self-expansion in relationships. In G. J. O. Fletcher & J. Fitness (Eds.), Knowledge structures in close relationships (pp. 325–344). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Merton, R. K. (1954). Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In M. Berger, T. Abel, & C. H. Page (Eds.), Freedom and control in modern society (pp. 18–66). Van Nostrand.
Downloads
Posted
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jiwoo Lee, Hannah Lee, Hailey Kim, Chloe Chung, Grace Kim

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.