Preprint / Version 1

Evolving Landscapes of Corporate Social Responsibility in the United States: Analyzing Funding Trends, Policy Frameworks, and Socioeconomic Impact (2015–2025)

##article.authors##

  • Siyona Jindal None

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.2986

Keywords:

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), CSR evolution, Sustainable business practices

Abstract

Over the past decade, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has undergone a significant transformation in the United States, evolving from a public relations tool into a core strategic imperative for long-term value creation. This research paper examines the dynamic evolution of CSR in the U.S. from 2015 to 2025, focusing on how corporations have adapted their social responsibility initiatives to meet changing societal expectations, regulatory developments, and investor demands. By analyzing funding patterns, emerging policy frameworks, and measurable socioeconomic outcomes, this study offers a comprehensive evaluation of CSR's shifting role in American business.

Key areas explored include the rise of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) metrics in corporate accountability, the growing influence of stakeholder capitalism, and sector-specific approaches to CSR in technology, retail, and manufacturing. Case studies of companies such as Microsoft, Patagonia, and Ben & Jerry’s illustrate diverse implementations of CSR in practice. Furthermore, the paper critically evaluates the limitations and critiques of CSR efforts, especially in relation to greenwashing and social equity.

Ultimately, this paper identifies actionable trends and strategies that define the future of CSR in the United States, emphasizing the need for transparency, cross-sector partnerships, and integrated policy support to maximize long-term social and economic returns.

References

Apple. (2021). Apple commits $100 million to racial equity and justice initiative. Retrieved from https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2021

Banerjee, S. B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology, 34(1), 51–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920507084623

Ben & Jerry’s. (2021). Justice ReMix’d: Our campaign for criminal justice reform. Retrieved from https://www.benjerry.com

Bloomberg. (2023). Red states move to ban ESG investing in pensions. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com

Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. New York: Harper & Row.

California Secretary of State. (2020). Women on boards: SB 826 and AB 979 overview. Retrieved from https://www.sos.ca.gov

Carnegie, A. (1889). Wealth. North American Review, 148(391), 653–664.

CECP. (2022). Giving in numbers: 2022 Edition. Chief Executives for Corporate Purpose. Retrieved from https://cecp.co

Cone Communications. (2017). 2017 Cone Communications CSR study. Retrieved from https://www.conecomm.com

Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 54(1), 64–87. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.64

Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x

Edelman Trust Barometer. (2022). 2022 Edelman trust barometer: The cycle of distrust. Retrieved from https://www.edelman.com/trust/2022-trust-barometer

Eccles, R. G., & Klimenko, S. (2019). The investor revolution. Harvard Business Review, 97(3), 106–116.

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

GIIN. (2023). Annual impact investor survey 2023. Global Impact Investing Network. Retrieved from https://thegiin.org

Governance & Accountability Institute. (2022). 90% of S&P 500 companies publish sustainability reports. Retrieved from https://www.ga-institute.com

Grewal, J., Riedl, E. J., & Serafeim, G. (2019). Market reaction to mandatory nonfinancial disclosure. Management Science, 65(7), 3061–3084. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3129

Harvard Business Review. (2018). Aligning profit with purpose. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org

Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2015). The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations: Analysts’ perceptions and shifting institutional logics. Strategic Management Journal, 36(7), 1053–1081. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2268

JUST Capital. (2021). Annual rankings of America's most just companies. Retrieved from https://justcapital.com

JPMorgan Chase. (2020). JPMorgan Chase commits $30 billion to advance racial equity. Retrieved from https://www.jpmorganchase.com

Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.31193458

Microsoft. (2020). Microsoft to skill 25 million workers amid pandemic impact. Retrieved from https://news.microsoft.com

Microsoft Philanthropies. (2022). Skills for jobs annual report. Retrieved from https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/philanthropies

Patagonia. (2022). Earth is now our only shareholder. Retrieved from https://www.patagonia.com

Philanthropy News Digest. (2021). Corporate giving to COVID-19 response exceeds $11 billion. Retrieved from https://philanthropynewsdigest.org

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.

Reuters. (2023). US states ramp up pressure against ESG investing. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com

Salesforce.org. (2023). Impact report: Workforce development & equity in education. Retrieved from https://www.salesforce.org

SEC. (2021). SEC announces enforcement task force focused on climate and ESG issues. Retrieved from https://www.sec.gov

Serafeim, G. (2020). Social-impact efforts that create real value. Harvard Business Review, 98(5), 38–48.

Target. (2021). Target to invest $100 million through REACH initiative. Retrieved from https://corporate.target.com

U.S. Congress. (2021). Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act. Public Law No: 117-78.

Urban Institute. (2021). Opportunity Zones: What we know and don’t know. Retrieved from https://www.urban.org

Downloads

Posted

2025-08-30

Categories