Estimating the Price Elasticity of Demand of the Premium on New Enrollment in the ACA Marketplaces
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.2907Keywords:
Economics, Health Care, Health Insurance, PolicyAbstract
The U.S. Affordable Care Act’s health insurance Marketplaces rely on open-enrollment periods (OEP) to attract new consumers, yet the extent to which premiums affect enrollment is unclear. We aim to find the price elasticity of demand for these plans. We have two hypotheses: 1) demand is elastic, so the percentage change in new consumers exceeds the percentage change in average premiums, or 2) demand is inelastic, so the opposite holds. We compare a baseline model to progressively more rigorous models, our final model being a fixed effects model that controls for time trends that affect all states equally and state-specific characteristics. The baseline estimate suggests a moderately elastic response of –0.8, meaning a 1 percent premium increase predicts a 0.8 percent drop in new enrollment. However, introducing state fixed effects reduces the elasticity to –0.4 percent, and adding time fixed effects further narrows down the elasticity to –0.2 percent, which we found is not statistically significant. Much of the observed premium-enrollment relationship in pooled data is explained by state-specific characteristics, which could include a given states’ regulations, insurer competition, or outreach efforts, rather than changes in the premium. We conclude that while a change in the premium can influence enrollment, its impact is statistically insignificant once a greater context is accounted for. Policymakers should therefore aim to combine premium subsidies or rate regulation with state-specific strategies. These strategies can include targeted efforts to subsidy design, competition, or outreach to more effectively boost ACA Marketplaces’ enrollment.
References
Baicker, K., & Chandra, A. (2005). Effects of rising malpractice costs on health insurance and employment. Journal of Health Economics, 24(3), 673–682.
Briones, E. M., & Cohen, R. A. (n.d.). Health insurance coverage: Early release of estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, January–June 2024. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhis/earlyrelease/insur202412.pdf
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2025). Qualified Health Plan Coverage and Premium Public Use File (PUF). Retrieved August 3, 2025, from cms.gov/cciio/resources/data-resources/marketplace-puf
Chernew, M. E., Cutler, D. M., & Keenan, J. R. (2005). Impact of rising health-insurance premiums on coverage rates in U.S. metropolitan areas. Health Services Research, 40(4), 1021–1039. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00409.x
Hermer, L. D. (2005). Private health insurance in the United States: A proposal for a more functional system. Houston Journal of Health Law & Policy, 6, 1–84.
Morrisey, M. A. (2008). Health insurance (2nd ed.). Health Administration Press.
Phelps, C. E., & Newhouse, J. P. (1974). Coinsurance, time costs, and the demand for medical services. Journal of Health Economics, 13(2), 151–169. https://doi.org/10.2307/1923971
Pendzialek, J. B., Simic, D., & Stock, S. (2016). Differences in price elasticities of demand for health insurance: A systematic review. European Journal of Health Economics, 17(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-014-0650-0
Riedel, L. M. (2009). Health insurance in the United States. AANA Journal, 77(6), 439–444.
ScienceDirect Topics. (n.d.). Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Retrieved August 3, 2025, from www.sciencedirect.com/topics/medicine-and-dentistry/bayesian-information-criterion#:~:text=Bayesian%20information%20criterion%20(BIC)%20(
U.S. Census Bureau. (2024). Health insurance coverage in the United States: 2023 (Current Population Reports P60-284). U.S. Government Publishing Office.
Downloads
Posted
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Justin Li, John Anagnost

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.