The Ethics of Existing Treatment of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Abstract

When considering the recent uprise in the amount of new Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) diagnoses, it is imperative to also recognize the limited amount of resources available to advocate and address the lessened quality of life for these particular women. Although existing research on the experiences associated with PCOS is lacking, the sources have been analyzed to show that patient dissatisfaction is prominent, indicating frequent ethical missteps. However, the existing data is seemingly outdated as not enough time or resources have been available to properly allocate in depth research for the furthering of PCOS development in the medical environment. Thus, through the accumulation of qualitative and quantitative data from a selected 24 participants that have been diagnosed with PCOS, I was able to inquire on the opinions participants have on the numerous aspects of PCOS that may be contributing to the poor treatments available. Using this data, I identify key patterns in the responses that point to common themes of patient negligence through superficial treatments and negative doctor-patient relationships. Thus, an expansive medical body of knowledge should be implemented in order to see an improvement in the upcoming years. Though some limitations are present in the execution of the method, it is a necessary starting point to begin the process of betterment of the medical atmosphere for PCOS.