Preprint / Version 1

State of the Art Comparison Between Polymer Electrolyte Membranes for Hydrogen Fuel Cell Applications

##article.authors##

  • Anson Ng The Quarry Lane School

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.2470

Keywords:

PEMFC, Fuel Cells, PFSA, Polymer Electrolyte Membrane, Conductivity, PBI

Abstract

Proton-exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) have been appealing for all sorts of applications and have been in use for many years, mainly for transportation applications because of new developments that have increased efficiency and power density while lowering operating temperature. However, in order to increase commercial viability and broaden use cases, PEMFCs must become more efficient. New research and developments in different polymer electrolyte membranes (PEMs) such as perfluorosulfonic acid membranes (PFSAs) and polybenzimidazole membranes (PBIs) have sought to increase efficiency and power density. This literature review focuses on state of the art proton membrane technologies such as PFSA, hydrocarbon-based, and PBI membranes. It provides a comprehensive review of basic fuel cell chemistry, mechanisms of function for these membranes as well as advantages and disadvantages, developments in the past few years, and an outlook as to where PEMFC technology will bring us in the future. PFSA membranes are the most widely used membrane currently, with Nafion™ currently dominating the market for PEMs. They have a high enough conductivity to be commercially viable, and have been in the market for decades. Hydrocarbon-based membranes are on the rise because of environmental laws banning or restricting PFSA, but still have many barriers before reaching commercial viability. PBI membranes are a more promising path, and are likely to take over the market in the near future given restrictions on PFSA.

References

October 1842: William Grove’s letter to Faraday Describing a Fuel Cell. https://www.aps.org/apsnews/2019/09/grove-letter-faraday-fuel-cell.

Collecting the History of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells. https://americanhistory.si.edu/fuelcells/pem/pemmain.htm.

Alaswad, A., Palumbo, A., Dassisti, M. & Olabi, A. G. Fuel Cell Technologies, Applications, and State of the Art. A Reference Guide. in Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering (Elsevier, 2016). doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.04009-1.

Khosravi H, S., Abbas, Q. & Reichmann, K. Electrochemical aspects of interconnect materials in PEMFCs. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 46, 35420–35447 (2021).

Maiti, T. K. et al. Advances in perfluorosulfonic acid-based proton exchange membranes for fuel cell applications: A review. Chem. Eng. J. Adv. 12, 100372 (2022).

NafionTM Sulfonic Membranes. https://www.nafion.com/en/products/sulfonic-membranes.

Economou, N. J., O’Dea, J. R., McConnaughy, T. B. & Buratto, S. K. Morphological differences in short side chain and long side chain perfluorosulfonic acid proton exchange membranes at low and high water contents. RSC Adv. 3, 19525 (2013).

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) - ECHA. https://echa.europa.eu/hot-topics/perfluoroalkyl-chemicals-pfas.

Mehta, V. & Cooper, J. S. Review and analysis of PEM fuel cell design and manufacturing. J. Power Sources 114, 32–53 (2003).

Kusoglu, A. & Weber, A. Z. New Insights into Perfluorinated Sulfonic-Acid Ionomers. Chem. Rev. 117, 987–1104 (2017).

Tang, Y. et al. An experimental investigation of humidity and temperature effects on the mechanical properties of perfluorosulfonic acid membrane. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 425, 297–304 (2006).

M.H. Khorasany, R., Sadeghi Alavijeh, A., Kjeang, E., Wang, G. G. & Rajapakse, R. K. N. D. Mechanical degradation of fuel cell membranes under fatigue fracture tests. J. Power Sources 274, 1208–1216 (2015).

Park, C. H., Lee, C. H., Guiver, M. D. & Lee, Y. M. Sulfonated hydrocarbon membranes for medium-temperature and low-humidity proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). Prog. Polym. Sci. 36, 1443–1498 (2011).

Qingfeng, L., Hjuler, H. A. & Bjerrum, N. J. Phosphoric acid doped polybenzimidazole membranes: Physiochemical characterization and fuel cell applications. J. Appl. Electrochem. 31, 773–779 (2001).

Araya, S. S. et al. A comprehensive review of PBI-based high temperature PEM fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 41, 21310–21344 (2016).

Hua, Z., Zheng, Z., Pahon, E., Péra, M.-C. & Gao, F. A review on lifetime prediction of proton exchange membrane fuel cells system. J. Power Sources 529, 231256 (2022).

Pham Hoa, B., Dong Duc, H., Nguyen Van, T., Nguyen Ngoc, A. & Ngoc Vu, Q. A review of PEM fuel cells used for automotive applications. J. Innov. Bus. Ind. 2, 55–60 (2024).

Qiu, D., Peng, L., Lai, X., Ni, M. & Lehnert, W. Mechanical failure and mitigation strategies for the membrane in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 113, 109289 (2019).

Downloads

Posted

2025-04-18

Categories