Preprint / Version 1

Examining the Correlation Between Circuit Demands and Performance Gaps between F1 Constructors

##article.authors##

  • Philip Choi Polygence

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.2174

Keywords:

engineering, physics, Circuit Demands

Abstract

This project investigates the relationship between the characteristics of various Formula 1 tracks and constructor performance, examining how varying circuit demands influence team competitiveness. The tracks are categorized by attributes such as high speed or more technical layouts. The study will analyze whether constructors with car design traits such as enhanced engine power or high downforce perform better on specific track types. Performance differences are analyzed across the various tracks, highlighting how certain car designs align with the demands of the track. Essentially, this project is designed to determine whether certain teams display a favorable advantage on particular track types, clarifying the strategic interactions between track characteristics and car performance in Formula 1. The findings revealed that teams with specific aerodynamic and powertrain strengths consistently performed better on tracks suited to their car design, confirming the hypothesis and highlighting the importance of track-specific strategies in Formula 1.

References

B. Spurgeon, “From Melbourne to Vegas: your guide to all 24 Formula 1 tracks this year,” Robb Report, Mar. 11, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://robbreport.com/motors/cars/gallery/your-guide-to-every-formula-1-circuit-in-1235539422/1-w-bahrain-1309587042/

“Feature: Downforce in Formula One, explained,” Mercedes-AMG PETRONAS F1 Team, Oct. 26, 2022. https://www.mercedesamgf1.com/news/feature-downforce-in-formula-one-explained

“F1 - the official home of Formula 1® racing,” Formula 1® - the Official F1® Website. https://www.formula1.com/en/results/2023/races

G. Anderson, “Gary Anderson's verdict on each F1 team's 2023 performance,” The Race, Dec. 24, 2023. https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/gary-anderson-season-review-f1-2023-every-team-performance/

K. Salerno, “Grip is F1’s Holy Grail!,” ADT Esports Academy - Formazione Professionale Su F1, Jun. 12, 2024. https://adtesportsacademy.com/grip-is-f1s-holy-grail/

RaceFans, “Formula 1 circuits · RaceFans,” RaceFans, Apr. 03, 2024. https://www.racefans.net/f1-information/going-to-a-race/

R. Braybrook, “What are the fastest and slowest corners on the F1 calendar?,” motorsport.com, Mar. 17, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/fastest-slowest-turns-f1-calendar/10572266/

W. Ambler, “How track surface & temperature impact F1 race strategy,” Catapult, Nov. 05, 2024. https://www.catapult.com/blog/race-strategy-f1-track-surface

S. Fans, “Monaco F1 track analysis: downforce and traction needed in Monte Carlo,” Scuderia Fans, May 23, 2024. https://scuderiafans.com/monaco-f1-track-analysis-downforce-and-traction-needed-in-monte-carlo/

S. Mitchell, “F1 2023 Performance Insights,” Racecar Engineering, Mar. 09, 2023. https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/f1/f1-2023-early-performance-insights/

Y. Elshebiny and Y. Elshebiny, “F1 Explained: What is downforce and why is it important?,” GPfans, Jan. 05, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.gpfans.com/en/f1-news/104261/f1-downforce-explained/

Downloads

Posted

2025-01-10