Preprint / Version 1

Optimization of an external compression fixed geometry ramp scramjet intake for performance across a wider range of Mach numbers

##article.authors##

  • Brandon Kong Foothill High School

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.2006

Keywords:

scramjets, hypersonic, supersonic, optimization, inlets

Abstract

Scramjets are a type of air breathing propulsion that operate at speeds above Mach 5, and provide opportunities for cheaper and more efficient transport to space. Traditional LH2/LOX rocket engines have a specific impulse (Isp, a measure of efficiency) of around 450s, whereas scramjets can have an Isp of around 3500s. However, scramjets face a multitude of issues, one of which being that fixed geometry scramjets are a point design optimized for a single speed, resulting in performance losses when not at the optimum speed. This paper is intended to optimize the performance across a wider range of Mach numbers in fixed geometry ramp intakes. The optimum number of ramps and the angles of them will be optimized to increase pressure recovery and prevent shock impingement. Typically, a greater number of shocks with oblique shocks at a less extreme angle results in better such performance. Research on such improvement has been done, but have focused on different inlet designs. This research instead focuses on fixed geometry external compression ramp intakes based on Oswatitsch and Kantrowitz criteria, and optimizes the inlet for speeds from Mach 6 to 8.

References

Ahuja, Kartika, and Srisha M V Rao. “Response of a cantilevered plate to shock impingement in hypersonic flows.” International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conferences, 2023, pp. 1-11. ARC, https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.2023-3072.

Brahmachary, Shuvayan, and Hideaki Ogawa. “Multipoint Design Optimization of Busemann-Based Intakes for Scramjet-Powered Ascent Flight.” JOURNAL OF PROPULSION AND POWER, vol. 37, no. 6, 2021, pp. 850-857, https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/1.B38383.

Dalle, Derek J. “Performance Analysis of Variable-Geometry Scramjet Inlets Using a Low-Order Model.” 47th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, 2011.

“Design and Performance of Hypersonic Intake for Scramjet Engine.” Hypersonic and

Supersonic Flight: Advances in Aerodynamics, Materials, and Vehicle Design, edited by Konstantin Nikolaevich Volkov, IntechOpen, 2022. Intechopen,

https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/84896. Accessed 25 October 2024.

Dirschel, Kevin, and et al. “Hypersonic Speed Through Scramjet Technology.” University of Colorado Boulder, 17 December 2015, https://www.colorado.edu/faculty/kantha/sites/default/files/attached-files/67552-116619_-_michael_riechers__dec_17_2015_1225_pm__dirscherl_riechers_sanders_final.pdf.

Accessed 25 October 2024.

Flock, Andreas K., and Ali Gülhan. “Modified Kantrowitz Starting Criteria for Mixed Compression Supersonic Intakes.” AIAA Journal, vol. 57, no. 5, 2019. ARC, https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/1.J057283.

Gao, Feng, and et al. “Numerical Study on Internal flow Field Dynamic Performance of Scramjet.” MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 288, no. 2019 5th Asia Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Aerospace Engineering (MEAE 2019), 2019, pp. 1-5. Matec Web of Conferences,

https://www.matec-conferences.org/articles/matecconf/abs/2019/37/matecconf_meae2019_02009/matecconf_meae2019_02009.html.

Kors, David. “Design considerations for combined air breathing-rocket propulsion systems.” ARC, vol. AIAA, International Aerospace Planes Conference, 2nd, Orlando, FL, Oct. 29-31, 1990. 8 p., 2012. ARC.

NASA. “X-43A Hyper-X.” NASA, 17 July 2017, https://www.nasa.gov/reference/x-43a/. Accessed 25 October 2024.

Niemeyer, Kyle. “Oblique Shock Waves.” Gas Dynamics notes, 2020,

https://kyleniemeyer.github.io/gas-dynamics-notes/compressible-flows/oblique-shocks.html. Accessed 25 October 2024.

Sandham, Neil D.. “Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interactions.” (2012).

Smart, Michael K. “How Much Compression Should a Scramjet Inlet Do?” AIAA Journal, vol. 50, no. 3, 2012, pp. 610-619. ARC.

Varvill, Richard, and Alan Bond. “A Comparison of Propulsion Concepts for SSTO Reusable Launchers.” JBIS, vol. 56, 2023, pp. 108-117. Harvard ADS, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003JBIS...56..108V/abstract.

Downloads

Posted

2024-11-19

Categories