Investigating the Effect of Information Intake Modality on Memory Retention in Adolescent Students
A Neuroscience Experiment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.1167Keywords:
Memory, Encoding, Retrieval, Memory retention, Kinematic memories, Amygdala, Dopamine, High School, AdolescenceAbstract
This neuroscience experiment aimed to investigate the most efficient method of information intake and storage for memory retention in adolescent learners. The study involved three categories of 9th and 10th-grade students who were tested on their memory retention through reading, writing, and listening. The participants were asked to engage in writing/copying, reading, or listening to a four sentence paragraph and then answer questions related to the content. The hypothesis predicted that writing would be the most effective technique for memorizing in adolescents. The result revealed that the group that participated in writing demonstrated the highest memory retention levels and answered the questions more accurately. This supports the notion that writing is the most efficient modality for memory retention in adolescent students compared to reading and listening. The experiment also explored the underlying processes involved in memory and highlighted the role of motor and kinematic memories in writing. The findings have significant implications for teaching strategies and technology design and interventions for individuals with memory difficulties. Overall this experiment contributes to our understanding of memory retention modalities in adolescents and their societal importance in education or technology, health and communication; etc.
References
Battaglia, Simone, and Julian F. Thayer. “Functional Interplay between Central and Autonomic Nervous Systems in Human Fear Conditioning.” Trends in Neurosciences, May 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2022.04.003. Accessed 21 May 2023.
Conway, Martin A., and Susan E. Gathercole. “Writing and long-term memory: Evidence for a “translation” hypothesis.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 16, no. 2, Mar. 1990, pp. 513–527, https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03213478. Accessed 22 May 2023.
Cowan, Emily T., et al. “Memory Consolidation as an Adaptive Process.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol. 28, no. 6, July 2021, pp. 1796–810, https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-01978-x. Accessed 22 May 2023.
Craik, Fergus IM, and Endel Tulving “Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory.” Journal of Experimental Psychology. Key Study: Levels of Processing. IB Psychology, edited by Travis Dixon, 4 Oct. 2021, p. 268, www.themantic-education.com/ibpsych/2021/10/04/key-study-levels-of-processing-craik-and-tulving-1975/. Accessed 22 May 2023.
Díaz, Fernando Castillo, Lucia Caffino, and Fabio Fumagalli. "Bidirectional role of dopamine in learning and memory-active forgetting." Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews vol. 131, December 2021, pp. 953–63, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.10.011. Accessed 22 May 2023.
Korte, Satu-Maarit. “Embodied Knowledge Construction Model of Affects in Writing.” Research Gate, vol. 25, no. 3, Dec. 2018, pp. 89–105, https://doi.org/10.26203/1qc6-2b1. Accessed 22 May 2023.
Moore, Damien, and Paul D. Loprinzi. “Exercise Influences Episodic Memory via Changes in Hippocampal Neurocircuitry and Long-Term Potentiation.” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 3, no. 54, Mar. 2020, pp. 6960–71, https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.1472. Research Gate. Accessed 22 May 2023.
MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit. “Understanding Health Research · Common Sources of Bias.” Www.understandinghealthresearch.org, University of Glasgow, www.understandinghealthresearch.org/useful-information/common-sources-of-bias-2. Accessed 25 May 2023.
Mueller, Pam A., and Daniel M. Oppenheimer. “The Pen Is Mightier than the Keyboard: Advantages of Longhand over Laptop Note Taking.” Psychological Science, vol. 25, no. 6, Apr. 2014, pp. 1159–68, https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524581. Sage Journals. https://linguistics.ucla.edu/people/hayes/Teaching/papers/MuellerAndOppenheimer2014OnTakingNotesByHand.pdf. Accessed 22 May 2023.
Quadt, Lisa, Hugo Critchley, and Yoko Nagai. “Cognition, Emotion, and the Central Autonomic Network.” Autonomic Neuroscience, vol. 238, May 2023, p. 102948, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autneu.2022.102948. Elsevier. Accessed 18 Mar. 2022.
Roüast, Nora Malika, and Monika Schönauer. “Continuously Changing Memories: A Framework for Proactive and Non-Linear Consolidation.” ScienceDirect, vol. 46, no. 1, Nov. 2022, pp. 8–19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2022.10.013. Accessed 22 May 2023.
UNICEF. “A Familiar Face: Violence in the Lives of Children and Adolescents - UNICEF DATA.” UNICEF DATA, Nov. 2017, data.unicef.org/resources/a-familiar-face/. Accessed 22 May 2023.
Zhang, Jiawei. “Cognitive Functions of the Brain: Perception, Attention and Memory.” Cornell University, May 2019, arxiv.org/abs/1907.02863. Accessed 22 May 2023.
Zimmer, Hubert D., and Johannes Engelkamp. “An Attempt to Distinguish between Kinematic and Motor Memory Components.” Acta Psychologica, vol. 58, no. 1, Jan. 1985, pp. 81–106, https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(85)90036-8. Accessed 22 May 2023.
Downloads
Posted
Versions
- 2024-10-22 (2)
- 2024-05-18 (1)
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mohammad Ibrahim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.